First published online March 14, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1209-1217 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01511
Directionality of the lizard ear
Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard1,* and
Geoffrey A. Manley2
1 Center for Sound Communication, SDU Odense University, Campusvej 55,
DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
2 Lehrstuhl für Zoologie, Technische Universität München,
Lichtenbergstrasse 4, 85747 Garching, Germany

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Eardrum vibration velocity spectra measured at different sound intensities
in (A) Leiolepis and (B) Gekko and normalized by division by
the sound spectrum measured at the eardrum. Under the assumption of linearity,
the normalized spectra in each figure should be identical.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Eardrum vibration velocity spectra (amplitude, dB) for the four species
studied: Mabuya (A), Leiolepis (B), Ctenosaura (C)
and Gekko (D). The spectra are normalized by division by the sound
spectra measured at the eardrum. Thick line: ipsilateral stimulation, broken
line: contralateral stimulation. Values are in dB re 1 mm s-1
Pa-1, i.e. 0 dB corresponds to a vibration velocity of 1 mm
s-1 at 1 Pa (94 dB SPL).
|
|

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Cylinder surface plots (for details, see Materials and methods) of eardrum
directionality in the four lizard species Mabuya (A),
Leiolepis (B), Ctenosaura (C) and Gekko (D). The
normalized velocities (colour scale, in dB re 1 mm s-1
Pa-1) are plotted as a function of direction (x-axis,
contralateral angles on the left and ipsilateral angles on the right) and
frequency (y-axis). The right and left row of figures show line plots
of velocity (y-axis, dB re 1 mm s-1 Pa-1) as a
function of direction (x-axis) at three frequencies (1000, 2000 and
3000 Hz, arrows), corresponding to three horizontal lines in the cylinder
surface plot. (E,F) Eardrum directionality after occluding one eardrum by a
dome of Vaseline. E, Mabuya; F, Leiolepis.
|
|

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Diffraction measured as ipsilateral-contralateral sound pressure difference
measured by a probe microphone at the eardrum in Mabuya (A),
Leiolepis (B), Ctenosaura (C) and Gekko (D).
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Interaural difference plot modeling the output of a binaural difference
(EI) neuron in the four lizard species Mabuya (A), Leiolepis
(B), Ctenosaura (C) and Gekko (D). The eardrum vibration
data set is subtracted from its reflection along the body axis. Other details
as in Fig. 3, except that the
colour scale now is relative interaural differences in dB. The line plots in
the left and right column show relative interaural differences
(y-axis) as a function of direction (x-axis) at three
frequencies (1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz, arrows). Note that the interaural
differences include the effect of sound diffraction by the body of the
lizard.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Cylinder surface plots of eardrum directionality (A) and interaural
difference (B) of a grass frog, Rana temporaria. Other details in A
as in Fig. 3A-D; in B as in
Fig. 5A-D.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005