spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 4, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 771-786 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01432
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Biewener, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Biewener, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Regional patterns of pectoralis fascicle strain in the pigeon Columba livia during level flight

Arya Soman, Tyson L. Hedrick and Andrew A. Biewener*

Concord Field Station, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Old Causeway Road, Bedford, MA 01730, USA



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Recording sites within the pigeon pectoralis, showing the locations of the sonomicrometry (SONO) crystals used to record in-series fascicle strain in the anterior (Ant) and middle (Mid) regions of the sternobrachialis (SB) portion of the pectoralis, together with SONO measurements obtained in the posterior (Post) SB and thoracobrachial (TB) portion of the pectoralis to assess regional patterns of fascicle strain. Electromyography (EMG) electrodes were implanted immediately adjacent to the SONO crystal pairs. The middle SONO crystal at the Ant and the Mid sites was used to `ping' the two opposing receiving crystals to obtain adjacent in-series measurements of fascicle segment strain at these two locations. Additionally, in three birds measurements of aponeurosis (APO) strain were obtained to examine series-elastic stretch of the aponeurosis resulting from forces transmitted to the deltopectoral crest (DPC) from the TB and more posterior regions of the SB. Measurements of overall muscle force were obtained from a strain gauge attached to the dorsal aspect of the DPC, the ventral surface to which the pectoralis has a tendinous insertion. See text for further details. (B) Map of the pectoralis muscle based on digital images obtained from the muscles of the six birds, showing the fascicle architecture and average recording locations (magenta fascicles) for each muscle region. Measurements of fascicle length and pinnation angle relative to the aponeurosis (shown in red) were determined from the images and referenced to a coordinate system at eight defined points along the SB and six points along the TB. To compare across animals, the positions of the recording sites were normalized as a percentage of SB and TB length relative to the caudal tip of the muscle. The locations (mean ± S.D.) of the fascicle recordings sites is shown below.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Representative in-series fascicle segment strain recordings obtained at the anterior and middle SB pectoralis sites for two wingbeats during slow (~4-5 m s-1) level flight, together with the EMG recorded from the distal location in each instance. EMG signals were bandpass filtered from 40 to 1500 Hz and sonomicrometer fascicle strain recordings were low-pass (40 Hz) filtered using a 4th order zero-lag digital Butterworth filter. In general, the pattern of fascicle strain (P>0.05 for time of maximum and minimum strain) and timing of EMG activation (P>0.05) were consistent across proximal and distal sites and at both locations among the birds sampled. In-series fascicle strain magnitude was also generally similar (in the cases shown for pigeon 3, distal fascicle strain averaged 3.5% less than that recorded from the proximal site), with differences in strain magnitude averaging less than 3.8% when proximal and distal sites were compared across all individuals at both locations sampled (see Table 2).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Summary histogram showing in-series fascicle strains (mean ± S.D.) measured at the anterior and middle SB regions of the pectoralis among the five birds sampled.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A,B) Representative fascicle strain and EMG recordings obtained at the four sampled regions of the pectoralis muscle, together with strain recordings of the aponeurosis and overall muscle force obtained from the DPC strain gauge. Recordings are for two wingbeats obtained from pigeons 1 and 3 during slow (~4-5 m s-1) level flight. EMG signals were bandpass filtered from 40 to 1500 Hz, and sonomicrometer and strain gauge recordings were low-pass (40 Hz) filtered, using a 4th order zero-lag digital Butterworth filter. In-series proximal and distal segment strain measurements obtained at the Ant and Mid SB sites were averaged to yield the overall patterns of fascicle strain depicted here for those muscle sites. (C) Mean fascicle and aponeurosis strains during a single wingbeat cycle based on data recorded from all individuals for which recordings were made at each site. Data were normalized to a full wingbeat cycle before being averaged, to maintain temporal consistency across individual animals.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Summary histogram showing regional patterns of fascicle strain (mean ± S.D.) measured at five sites (see Fig. 1) within the pectoralis. Note that strains measured along the intramuscular aponeurosis represent passive length changes associated with series-elastic stretch of the aponeurosis resulting from forces transmitted by the TB and posterior SB fibers that insert on the aponeurosis.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Summary histogram of the timing (mean ± S.D.) of muscle activation and strain recorded from the different regions of the pigeon pectoralis, together with total muscle force measured at the DPC. Time zero is defined relative to when the pectoralis exerts peak force, with the force histogram spanning the period of force development by the muscle. EMG histograms span from the mean onset to the mean offset of the EMG. Strain histograms span from the onset of muscle lengthening to the end of muscle shortening. The central bar within the strain histograms represents the time the muscle region reaches its peak length.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Map of pectoralis fascicle architecture and geometry at three time points during the downstroke: (A) maximum (Mid SB) strain at start of downstroke, (B) maximum DPC pectoralis force, approximately one-third through downstroke, and (C) minimum (Mid SB) strain at end of downstroke. Distal end displacements of the defined fascicle regions shown as solid colored diamonds are referenced to their resting position (open diamonds), proximal ends were fixed in position and are shown as solid coloured circles. Displacements were determined using a 2D model of the pectoralis derived from digital images of the muscles that were referenced to a calibrated coordinate system, based on fascicle lengths and angles measured at eight defined points along the SB and six defined points along the TB portions of the muscle. Fascicle displacements reflect the average inter-individual strains recorded at each site, combined with their average coordinate locations (see Fig. 1B).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Total fascicle strain plotted versus fascicle length for level flight, based on measurements obtained for all recordings sites in six pigeons. No significant relationship between total strain and fascicle length was observed (least squares regression: r2=0.144, P>0.05).

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Work loops obtained from different regions of the pectoralis muscle in two pigeons plotted with fascicle length expressed as both strain (A,C) and length (B,D). The black arrow denotes the counter-clockwise path of the work loop, indicating the positive net work (area contained within the work loop in B,D) performed during the muscle's fascicles over the course of the wingbeat cycle. Note that the more posterior regions of the muscle have both shorter fascicles and reduced strains (A,C), leading to reduced mechanical work output. Cycle duration was 0.11 s for both pigeons, giving power outputs ranging from 7.9 to 20.5 W. All loops are taken from the 5th wingbeat of one trial from each bird.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Histogram showing the mass-fractions (open bars) and work-fractions (shaded bars, inter-individual mean ± S.E.M.) of muscle work estimated for the four muscle regions (SB: Ant, Mid, Post and TB; see Fig. 1) from which in vivo fascicle strains were sampled. Mass-fraction data were obtained for all six pigeons, whereas work-fractions were obtained for those animals and regions in which reliable work loops (Fig. 9) were obtained over multiple wingbeat cycles. Mass-weighted work fractions were calculated by multiplying the net work from each region by the fractional mass (Table 1), then dividing by the summed averages for all regions. The average summed work was 1.28 W and average duration was 0.12 s. Individual bird values were based on a minimum sample of 8 wingbeats, with an average sample size of 40 wingbeats (Table 4).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005