spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 4, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 737-747 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01430
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkens, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by ter Keurs, H. E. D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkens, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by ter Keurs, H. E. D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sites and modes of action of proctolin and the FLP F2 on lobster cardiac muscle

J. L. Wilkens1,*, T. Shinozaki2, T. Yazawa3 and H. E. D. J. ter Keurs4

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Sendai, Japan
3 Department of Biology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiohsawa 1-1, Hachioji, Japan
4 Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada



View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The effects of proctolin, F2 and glutamic acid on force development of lobster cardiac ostia. In (A) and (B) the threshold concentration of each peptide was continuously perfused for 4 min, in the other four traces (C-F) the peptide or glutamic acid (Glu) was present for 30 s. Tetani were produced by trains of stimuli (5 ms pulses, 20 Hz, 200 ms train duration, 2 trains min-1).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. (A) Potentiation of tetani produced by prolonged electrical stimulation with 2 ms stimuli, 50 Hz for 3.5 s. The single tetani before and following prolonged stimulation were produced by 2 ms stimuli, 50 Hz and 200 ms train duration. Caffeine-induced contractures (arrows, 1 mmol l-1 for 30 s) applied before and following a (B) proctolin (1 µmol l-1 for 30 s) and a (C) F2 (1 µmol l-1 for 30 s) induced contracture. (D) Caffeine pulses (arrows, 10 mmol l-1 for 60 s) applied before and following a glutamic acid pulse (10 mmol l-1 for 60 s). There were no electrical stimuli delivered during PR-, F2- and Glu-induced contractures.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) Effect of PR (1 µmol l-1, 90 s) on membrane potential (mV) and input resistance (uncalibrated, downward deflections, upper trace), and on tetani and contracture (lower trace). The resting membrane potential before PR was -68 mV. During the contracture there was a period of 2 min during which the OOM showed oscillations in membrane potential and force. (B) Effect of F2 (1 µmol l-1, 90 s) on membrane potential (mV) and input resistance (uncalibrated, downward deflections, upper trace), and on tetani and contracture (lower trace). The resting membrane potential before F2 was -80 mV. During the contracture there were spontaneous contractions and fluctuations in membrane potential.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Normalized augmentation of tetani following pulses of PR or F2 (0.1 µmol l-1, 30 s) for OOM equilibrated in normal and reduced [Ca2+]o (2, 6 and 18 mmol l-1, respectively; N=4; *P<0.05).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The [Ca2+]i and force of an OOM during exposure to three concentrations of proctolin. The peptide was applied for 60 s. Time zero is a response before peptide arrival, the other numbers written above the tetani are time in minutes after PR. The tetani were produced by trains of stimuli (1 ms pulses, 30 Hz, 300 ms train duration, 0.1 trains s-1).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Force/intracellular pCa loops taken before (time=0) and at various times in minutes after a 60 s exposure to 1 µmol l-1 proctolin. Each loop represents a tetanus produced by a stimulus train (as in Fig. 4). The elevated force during the diastolic period represents the period of contracture. The arrowhead on the zero time trace shows the direction of the changes in force and pCa.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effects of L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channel blockers on responses to proctolin and F2. (A) OOM was perfused with nifedipine (0.1 mmol l-1) saline for 30 min before 30 s pulses of PR and F2 (0.1 µmol l-1 each). (B) Verapamil (0.1 mmol l-1) was perfused for 31 min before 30 s pulses of PR and F2 (0.1 µmol l-1 each). (C) CdCl2 (1 mmol l-1) greatly attenuated tetani, but did not prevent contractures following 30 s pulses of PR (0.1 µmol l-1) or F2 (10 nmol l-1).

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Na+-free saline greatly attenuated tetani and caused a contracture. At the points indicated by arrows PR and F2 (0.1 µmol l-1 each, 30 s) caused small contractures.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Continuous perfusion with caffeine saline (10 mmol l-1) reduced or eliminated tetani, but had little effect on basal tonus. In both traces the peptide-induced contracture developed more rapidly and was greater in amplitude during the period of caffeine exposure then before. The recovery of the contracture was faster than in the absence of caffeine. Note the rapid recovery of tetani immediately following the washout of caffeine in (B).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Effect of ryanodine (10 µmol l-1) on the [Ca2+]i and force responses of an OOM to two concentrations of proctolin (10 nmol l-1 and 1 µmol l-1). The OOM had been superfused with saline-containing ryanodine for a minimum of 30 min before the peptide challenges. Stimulus trains consisted of 1 ms pulses, 50 Hz, 500 ms train duration, 0.1 trains s-1.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005