spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 2, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4709-4714 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01929
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dyer, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Chittka, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dyer, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Chittka, L.

Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces

Adrian G. Dyer1,2,*, Christa Neumeyer1 and Lars Chittka3

1 Institut fur Zoologie III (Neurobiologie), Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, 55099, Germany,
2 Clinical Vision Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
3 School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK



View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 (A) Foraging set up for honeybees. (B) Bee looking at a target face. (C) The ability of bees to discriminate between images of human faces. The upper region shows task (target top and distracter bottom), and the column immediately below shows mean percentage of correct choices for five bees in non-rewarded tests (±1 S.E.M.). Bees were trained to the face at the top of column i versus a schematic face distracter, then to recognise the target face from the distracter in column ii. Bees then recognised the target face from novel distracters (columns iii, iv) but failed to discriminate faces rotated by 180° (column v). Pooled choices for non-rewarded tests in the respective conditions (i=166, ii=246, iii=199, iv=196, v=141).

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Acquisition for five bees (± S.E.M.) learning to discriminate a target face from the distractor face stimulus shown in Fig. 1C column ii.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005