spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 17, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4451-4466 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01917
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ausborn, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kayser, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ausborn, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kayser, H.

The insecticide pymetrozine selectively affects chordotonal mechanoreceptors

Jessica Ausborn1, Harald Wolf1,*, Wolfgang Mader1 and Hartmut Kayser2

1 University of Ulm, Neurobiology Department, D 89069 Ulm, Germany
2 Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Research and Technology, WRO-1004.4.46, CH 4002 Basel, Switzerland



View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of pymetrozine and its inactive phenyl analogue.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Locust, Locusta migratoria, before (A) and after (B,C) pymetrozine application (0.5 µg g–1 body mass). The animal in A assumes a typical resting posture, holding the body elevated above the substrate with all the legs, sometimes except the hind legs, touching the ground. (B,C) Note extended femur–tibia joints, lifted legs (in the coxal joints) and lifted tarsi after pymetrozine application. Leg and body posture appear uncoordinated and the body is not held above the substrate but rather rests on the floor. In C, the conspicuous levitation of both hind legs is evident. Body length of insects is 60 mm.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Feedback loop controlling femur–tibia joint position in insects. (A) Anatomical situation, semi-schematic diagram of a locust middle leg. The means of experimental access to elements of the joint control loop are indicated: a clamp attached to a transducer (TD) allows stimulation of the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) via its apodeme (tendon); a suction electrode (SE) records activity of fCO sensillae; a hook electrode (HE) monitors discharges of motoneurons supplying the extensor (or flexor) tibiae muscle; and movement of the tibia is monitored optically. (B) Cybernetic diagram of the feedback loop for joint control. Anatomical correlates of the elements of the control circuit are indicated (cybernetic terms in brackets). Numbers in A and B indicate corresponding structures (e.g. 1, sensor, fCO). (C) Resistance reflex generated in the quiescent animal. A ramp-and-hold stimulus delivered to the fCO (bottom trace; arrow indicates imposed fCO elongation, mimicking tibia flexion) elicits a spike discharge in the nerve supplying the extensor muscle (top trace; spikes of the three innervating motoneurons are marked: FETi, fast; SETi, slow extensor motoneuron; CI, common inhibitor). Note the pronounced response to movement and the smaller maintained discharge due to altered fCO position. Thresholds and bins for evaluation are indicated; for details, see text.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of pymetrozine on the resistance reflex response in the extensor tibiae motor nerve. (A,B) near-threshold concentration. (A) Sample recording from the middle leg's extensor nerve (i) before and (ii) after application of 10–8 mol l–1 pymetrozine, during ramp-and-hold stimulation of the fCO (bottom trace; stimulus amplitude 240 µm, or ~40°). (B) Peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) were constructed from the recording sample in A (i) before and (ii,iii) after pymetrozine application (bin width 20 ms; ordinates normalised to number of stimulus presentations, as in all following figures; stimulus, bottom trace). The histogram in Bii was constructed from experiments where a tonic spike discharge was observed after pymetrozine application (N=8), the histogram in Biii from experiments without such tonic discharge (N=2). (C,D) Effect of pymetrozine at higher concentrations (10–5 mol l–1); same presentation as in A and B. (C) Sample recording from the middle leg extensor nerve (i) before and (ii) after pymetrozine application (stimulus, bottom trace). (D) PST histograms constructed from the recordings (i) before and (ii) after pymetrozine application (bin width 20 ms; stimulus, bottom trace). (E) Increased stimulus amplitude [360 µm (~60°); instead of 240 µm] or (F) increased stimulus velocity (455 deg. s–1; instead of 45 deg. s–1) did not restore the feedback response abolished by pymetrozine. Same recordings as in C and D, response before pymetrozine application in Ci and Di.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of pymetrozine on the resistance reflex in the middle leg femur–tibia joint of the stick insect Cuniculina impigra. (A) Tibia position (middle trace) in response to sinusoidal stimulation of the femoral chordotonal organ (bottom trace; stimulus frequency 0.5 Hz; amplitude 400 µm, corresponding to ~80° tibia movement; arrow indicates tibia extension and fCO elongation). Top trace shows a flexor tibiae electromyogram. Application of 10–6 mol l–1 (probably diluted before actually reaching the fCO) pymetrozine was just before the beginning of the sample shown. (B,C) In this animal, movement response declined slowly within 1–2 mins of pymetrozine application. This allowed measurement at two stimulus frequencies (0.02 and 0.05 Hz; filled circles). The modified Bode diagram plots response amplitude (B) and phase lag (C) versus stimulus frequency (diamonds, before pymetrozine). Note the decrease in response amplitude and unaltered phase lag after pymetrozine application. Arrow in B indicates stimulus situation depicted in A (0.5 Hz, different animal).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of pymetrozine on individual femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) receptor cells. (A) Sample recording from the soma of an fCO receptor cell (distal scoloparium) in the middle leg (i) before and (ii) after 10–5 mol l–1 pymetrozine application. Stimulus shown in bottom trace (amplitude 240 µm, ~40°). Note response of this receptor cell to the elongation phase of the ramp-and-hold stimulus, mimicking flexion of the femur–tibia joint. Scale bar, 5 s. (B) PST histograms constructed from the recording depicted in A, as described for Fig. 4. Broken line in A marks the threshold used for spike selection in the construction of the time histograms in B.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The threshold for pymetrozine action on the femoral chordotonal organ is 10–8 mol l–1. Response of the middle leg femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) was monitored during ramp-and-hold stimulation of the receptor apodeme [ordinate; spike counts during elongation (filled circles) and relaxation (filled squares) ramps, baseline activity subtracted]. Different concentrations of pymetrozine were applied, starting with 10–9 mol l–1 and increasing in steps of 5-fold or 2-fold (abscissa) every ~25 min until stimulus-related responses had completely vanished. 10–5 mol l–1 was applied as the final control concentration. Numbers of measurements per data point (n=N) range from 6 (above-threshold concentrations) to 12 (threshold area). Median values and 25% percentiles are shown. Graph for relaxation stimuli is offset to the right by 20% for better visibility of percentiles. Note that calculation of medians from data obtained in several individuals obscures the fact that in any given animal pymetrozine had an all-or-none effect, although at slightly different concentrations; for details, see text.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Intracellular motoneuron recording does not reveal residual stimulus-related responses after pymetrozine application. (A) Recording taken during pymetrozine application (10–7 mol l–1, application started ~30 s before sample shown in Ai). Bottom trace, ramp-and-hold stimulation of femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) (240 µm, arrow indicates fCO elongation); middle trace, intracellular recording from FETi soma; top trace, EMG from flexor tibiae muscle. (Aii) Brushing the abdomen (heavy arrow) leads to active movements; concomitant synaptic input to FETi proves that the intracellular recording had not been lost during the previous pymetrozine application. Note that the pronounced depolarisation of FETi was transient, probably caused by the initial tonic fCO discharge sometimes observed after pymetrozine application, and disappeared after a few minutes. FETi membrane potential was approximately –50 mV at rest and increased by 5.5 mV in the course of the sample recording. This depolarisation apparently reduced and eventually prevented spike discharges towards the end of the sample shown. (B) Stimulus-related averaging of the intracellular FETi record before (top trace) and after (middle trace) pymetrozine application demonstrates the absence of residual stimulus-related input after pymetrozine. (C) Histogram of flexor tibiae activity before (top trace) and after (middle trace) pymetrozine application illustrates the absence of stimulus-related discharge in FETi's antagonist. B and C show data from the same recording as in A; bottom traces as in A; note response of FETI to fCO elongation and of flexor tibiae muscle to fCO relaxation. Scale bars: (A) 10 mV, 5 s; (B) 5 mV, 250 ms; (C) 36 spikes bin–1 (bin width 10 ms), 250 ms.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Pymetrozine was not observed to have effects on the campaniform sensillae of the dorsal tibia (A), the wing hinge stretch receptor (B), the campaniform sensillae on the subcosta vein (C) or the hair sensillae on the tegula (D). Data before (top traces) and after (middle traces) pymetrozine application (10–6 mol l–1) are shown for comparison; stimulus application is shown in the lower traces [pressure on sensillae in A, upward movement of the wing in B, pressure on the subcosta vein in C (note that stimulus duration outlasted length of sample trace for lower recording), stroking of tegula hairs in D (only stimulus onset shown here due to variable stimulus durations)]. (i) Sample recordings; (ii) time histograms. Ordinates of histograms normalised to number of stimulus presentations, bin widths 25 ms in A, 10 ms in B and D, 5 ms in C. Note that in A the campaniform sensillae respond strongly to the onset of cuticular pressure but just slightly to maintained pressure and to termination of cuticle indentation. Arrow in B indicates response of wing chordotonal organ sensillae to the stimulus.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. The chordotonal organs associated with the wing hinge stretch receptor (A) and the tegula (B) are affected by pymetrozine like the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO). Data before (top traces) and after (middle traces) pymetrozine application (10–6 mol l–1) are shown for comparison; stimulus (lower trace in A; downward movement of wing); arrows in B (onset of pressure on tegula base). (i) Sample recordings; (ii) time histograms. Ordinates of histograms normalised to number of stimulus presentations, bin widths 10 ms.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Pymetrozine was not observed to have effects on central mesothoracic motor control circuits, or on higher control centres, e.g. in the subesophageal ganglion. The response of the extensor (A) and flexor (B) tibiae nerves to ramp-and-hold stimulation of the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO; bottom traces, 240 µm or ~40° fCO movement) was examined before and after application of 10–6 mol l–1 pymetrozine to the ventral nerve cord, but not to the fCO (hemolymph space of the leg isolated by VaselineTM plug (see text). Sample recordings (i and ii) and time histograms (iii and iv) are shown for the intact (control) situation (i and iii) and after pymetrozine application (ii and iv). Bin widths of histograms 10 ms; ordinates normalized to number of stimulus presentations. Different individuals were used in A and B.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. Patterned motoneuron activity during walking-like movements persists after pymetrozine treatment. Data before (A) and after (B) pymetrozine application (0.5 µg g–1 body mass) are shown for comparison. Ai and Bi show sample recordings; leg position, top trace (anterior is to the top, i.e. swing phases are represented by rapid upward strokes); electromyograms (EMGs) of tibia extensor (M106) and coxa levator/protractor (M94/95) muscles, middle and bottom traces, respectively. Aii and Bii show corresponding averages of leg movement (top) and time histograms of EMG discharges (middle and bottom; bin widths 10 ms, ordinate scales normalised to number of steps evaluated). Zero on the abscissa marks the start of swing movement; reference lines in top traces mark lateral leg position. Note the differences in leg movement and timing of levator activity after pymetrozine application; for details, see text.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005