First published online November 17, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4399-4410 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01901
Echolocating bats can use acoustic landmarks for spatial orientation
Marianne Egebjerg Jensen1,2,*,
Cynthia F. Moss1 and
Annemarie Surlykke2
1 Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland,
USA
2 Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense,
Denmark

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. A schematic drawing of the experimental setup (not to scale). The net
divided a large flight room in two, and the net position could be adjusted to
change the location of the opening in the horizontal axis. The center of the
hole was approximately 1.5 m above the floor. Two high speed cameras were
placed in corners of the room and recorded the bat's flight path. Two
microphones placed 30 cm above the floor, one on each side of the net (both 50
cm from the net), recorded the bat's echolocation pulses. A landmark (photo
tripod) was placed on the left side of the hole, and a tethered mealworm was
hung from the ceiling at various positions on the other side of the net. The
bat had to find its way through the net opening in order to get the mealworm
reward.
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Flight patterns for three different behaviors (AC), along with the
corresponding spectrograms of the sounds produced by the bats (DF).
(A,D) A bat flew through the hole. (B,E) A bat inspected the hole. (C,F) A bat
crashed into the net next to the landmark, at the usual position of the hole
relative to the landmark. (AC) The bats' flight paths are displayed as
viewed from above. The net is indicated by a diagonal line and the opening is
marked in pink. The pink triangle represents the landmark's position along the
net in the specific trial. Blue circles denote the bat's position at the time
of vocalization and black arrows indicate flight direction. (DF) In the
spectrograms, some of the pulses are clustered together in sound groups with
two or three pulses (bracketed). A vertical red line in the spectrogram shows
the time the bat flew through the hole, crashed into the net or started an
inspection.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. (AC) Average number of crashes and flights through the hole per
trial, and (D) the average duration of trials. Values are means +1
S.D. Data are shown for each bat (M1, M2, F1)
separately. (A) The landmark is placed next to the hole. In the fly through
data F1 failed to find the hole in one trial, which explains the error bar for
that bat. (B) The landmark is moved to a position away from the hole. (C) Here
there was no landmark available. (D) The average duration of a trial, when the
landmark was next to the hole, moved away from the hole, or no landmark
available.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Average number of inspections per trial when (A) the landmark was next to
the hole, (B) the landmark was moved to another position and (C) there was no
landmark available. A and C show all inspections recorded, whereas in B
inspections are separated into inspections of landmark and inspections of the
rest of the net including the hole. Values are means +1
S.D.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Average performance of the bats as a function of trial number over a
session in the experiment with no landmark at the hole. (A) The average
success of flying through the hole. (B) The average time spent on the trials.
(C) The average number of crashes into the net far away from the hole and (D)
the average number of crashes into the net around the hole. Values are means
+1 S.D.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Typical trials showing signal duration (black line) and pulse interval (PI;
blue line) when the bat (A) flew through the hole (F1), (B) crashed into the
net (M2), or (C) inspected the net (M2). In C the zero indicates the start of
the inspection behavior (see Materials and methods and
Fig. 2B). Note in B how the
pulse interval shifted up and down as the pulses were produced in little sound
groups (in red circle). Further, note the high rate sound group (indicated by
arrows) just before the bat crashed, showing very short signal durations and
intervals.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. The inner window (i.e. duration of emitted pulse recalculated to distance;
blue line), the bat's distances to the net (green line), the mealworm (black
line), and the landmark, if present (pink line). Time 0 is when the bat
interacts with the net (fly through or crash). The red arrows indicate the
point in time where overlap between the inner window and the net echo starts
(blue and green lines cross and blue line is above the green line). (A,B) The
bat flew through the hole and in (A) experienced an overlap 200 ms before it
flew through the hole (see red arrow), but in (B) produced a high rate sound
group and overlap between the pulse and the net echo did not occur until 90 ms
before the bat flew through the hole (red arrow). (C,D) The bat crashed into
the net. In (C) the bat produced a high rate sound group and the overlap
occurred around 50 ms before the bat crashed, whereas in (D) the bat did not
produce this high rate sound group and experienced an overlap between pulse
and net echoes 190 ms before crashing into the net.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005