First published online September 16, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3731-3737 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01796
Prior classical olfactory conditioning improves odour-cued flight orientation of honey bees in a wind tunnel
Antoine Chaffiol1,*,
David Laloi2 and
Minh-Hà Pham-Delègue3
1 Laboratoire de Physiologie Cérébrale, CNRS UMR 8118, 6 Rue
des Saint-Pères, 75006 Paris, France
2 Laboratoire Fonctionnement et Evolution des Systèmes Ecologiques,
UMR 7625, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Box 237, 7 Quai Saint
Bernard, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
3 Direction des Relations Internationales, CNRS, 3 Rue Michel-Ange, 75794
Paris, France

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. General characteristics of the wind tunnel, with an example of a typical
honey bee oriented flight.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Orientation of worker bees in the wind tunnel according to the odorous
stimulation: nestmates' odour, linalool and no odour (control group). (A) Mean
duration ± S.D. of the total flight and of the flight around
the odour source. (B) Percentages of bees exhibiting orientated flights
(upwind zigzag flight) and circling behaviour. Asterisks indicate significant
differences: P<0.05; NS, not significant.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Effect of a proboscis extension conditioning procedure on the orientation
towards linalool. (A) Mean duration ±S.D. (seconds) of the
total flight and of the flight around the odour source. (B) Percentages of
bees exhibiting orientated flights (up-wind zig-zag flight) and circling
behaviour. Asterisks indicate significant differences:
*P<0.05; **P<0.01;
***P<0.001; NS, not significant.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005