spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 18, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3421-3429 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01771
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henninger, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henninger, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, W. H., III
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mechanisms underlying the production of carapace vibrations and associated waterborne sounds in the American lobster, Homarus americanus

Heidi Pye Henninger and Winsor H. Watson, III*

University of New Hampshire, Zoology Department, Durham, NH 03824, USA



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The percentage of lobsters that vibrated in (A) each size class and (B) each month during body vibration surveys. Different letters denote statistically significant differences in the percentage of lobsters that vibrated in each group (P=0.05).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Body vibrations recorded from a 78 mm CL intermolt female. Individual lobsters often produced signals of variable durations. (A) As an example, the first vibration shown was 170 ms long while the second vibration was 1590 ms in duration. (B) Expanded view of the first body vibration, denoted with a bar in A. Scale: A, 20 mV, 250 ms; B, 20 mV, 25 ms.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A) Mean frequency and (B) duration of body vibrations produced by three size classes, each of five lobsters (<65 mm CL, 75–84 mm CL, >90 mm CL). Different letters denote statistically significant differences (P=0.05).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Body vibrations give rise to waterborne acoustic signals. (A) Simultaneous recording of a 300 ms body vibration, recorded in Chart software, and a waterborne sound recorded using Canary software. (B) Expanded view of a waterborne sound recorded in Canary software. Notice in the spectrogram that the most intense sounds (darkest colors) are of a low frequency (<300 Hz).

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Sounds and body vibrations are produced by contractions of the remotor and promotor muscles. (A) Example of a simultaneous accelerometer recording of body vibrations and remotor and promotor muscle electromyograms (EMGs). The top photograph shows the anatomy of the two muscles (P, promotor; R, remotor). (B) Expanded view of a section of a different simultaneous recording of vibrations and muscle activity. There is a clear one-to-one relationship between each wave in the accelerometer recording (V), or carapace movement, and muscle activity. Scale: 10 mV for the top trace (vibration), 8 µV for the EMG traces; time scale=200 ms; B, top, 8 mV, 20 ms; bottom, 4 µV, 10 ms.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Electromyogram (EMG) recordings of all four sonic muscles during the production of a series of vibration pulses. (A) Lobsters most often produced body vibrations by using the paired remotor and promotor muscles of only one antenna (i.e. left or right) and often alternated between sides. Every lobster tested used both sides in alternation, although in some individuals one side was favored and used most often. (B) Lobsters also used simultaneous contractions of the sonic muscles of both antennae to produce signals. In some cases, both sets of muscles were used during the entire vibration, or, as seen in B, one set was used for only part of the event. Vibrations produced by both sets of muscles were not significantly longer in duration or different in frequency than vibrations produced by one set. Scale: A and B, 20 mV for the top trace (accelerometer), 16 µV for the EMG traces; time scale=200 ms.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Electromyogram (EMG) recordings of lesioned and intact muscles. In this example, the left antennal muscles (both remotor and promotor) were lesioned at their insertion into the musculature of the dorsal carapace, while the right antennal muscles were kept intact. While the muscles of the left antenna still contracted, they were unable to cause a vibration (recorded by the accelerometer in the top trace). However, when the intact muscles of the left antenna were active, they produced body vibrations. Lobsters continued to alternate between the muscles of each side and did not avoid using the lesioned muscles. Scale: 20 mV for the top trace (accelerometer), 16 µV for the EMG traces; time scale=100 ms.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Accelerometer recordings demonstrating that electrical stimulation of sonic muscles yielded carapace vibrations. Remotor muscle stimulation, and stimulation of both the remotor and promotor muscles simultaneously, resulted in body vibrations, while stimulation of promotor muscles did not cause body vibrations. Electrical stimulations involving both muscles created vibrations most similar in waveform and intensity to naturally produced sounds. Horizontal bars indicate the periods of stimulation. Scale: 5 mV, 150 ms.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Spontaneous carapace vibrations produced by a male lobster. The vibrations produced were lower in frequency and shorter in duration than those typically elicited by startling or threatening lobsters. Scale: 20 mV for the top trace (accelerometer), 8 µV for the middle EMG trace, 16 µV for the bottom EMG trace; time scale=125 ms.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005