spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 6, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2625-2631 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01609
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weyand, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weyand, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. A.

Running performance has a structural basis

Peter G. Weyand1,2,* and J. Adam Davis1

1 Locomotion Laboratory, Kinesiology Department, MS–545, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA
2 Center for Human Performance, Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mass-specific stance-averaged support forces vs running speed. (A) stance-averaged force vs running speed in a representative subject; (B) mean stance-averaged support forces for athletic male (M; N=9) and female (F; N=9) subjects (M: y=1.27 + 0.105x; F: y=1.24 + 0.106x). Vertical hashes across the horizontal lines appearing in the upper portion represent the average race velocities of elite male and female specialists at each event distance. y-intercept values of Fg typically do not equal 1.0 because they are extrapolations beyond the range of speeds at which running is possible.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Body sizes of elite specialists vs event distance (means ± S.E.M.). (A) Body mass; (B) height.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Body mass index (BMI) and ground support forces vs event distance. (A) Body mass index; (B) ground support forces determined from the average racing speeds of event specialists; (C) the ratio of BMI to mass-specific ground support force of specialists vs event distance (mean BMI Fg–1=9.92 kg m–2; broken horizontal line).

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The product of ground support force and height-squared in relation to body mass (mass=–0.006+0.101x, R2=0.97).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005