QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online June 16, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2539-2547 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01677

This Article Summary Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Wessel, T. Articles by van Eijden, T. M. G. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Wessel, T. Articles by van Eijden, T. M. G. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Burst characteristics of daily jaw muscle activity in juvenile rabbits

T. van Wessel^1,*, G. E. J. Langenbach¹, N. Kawai², P. Brugman¹, E. Tanaka² and T. M. G. J. van Eijden¹

¹ Department of Functional Anatomy, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
² Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Developmental Biology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan

View larger version (42K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Electrode locations and method of data analysis. (A) Implantation site of the transmitter in the neck area and locations of the electrodes in the five jaw muscles. (B) Examples of 5 min of simultaneously recorded EMG of three jaw muscles. (C) The enlargement (left) shows 1 s of muscle activity from the superficial masseter. The broken lines indicate the levels 5% and 50% of the peak-EMG. A burst was classified as a series of consecutive samples exceeding a predefined level of activity. The total number of bursts during 1 day was classified for muscle activities exceeding the 5% and 50% levels, which resulted in the distributions of burst number as a function of burst length (right). Note that the 5 min example (B) is not representative of the depicted distributions in C.

View larger version (33K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. (A) Burst number, (B) mean burst length (s) and (C) duty time (%) for 1 day in week 9 (filled bars) and week 14 (open bars). Muscle activities exceeding 5%, 20%, 50% and 90% of the peak-EMG for all tested muscles are shown. Values are means ± S.D. Diga, digastric; Msan, superficial masseter; Mppo, posterior deep masseter; Ptm, medial pterygoid; Tem, temporalis. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P<0.05). Asterisks in A and C exceeding 50% and 90% indicate that the superficial masseter and medial pterygoid significantly differed from the digastric, deep masseter and temporalis.

View larger version (19K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Distributions of burst lengths of five jaw muscles averaged for all animals. Distributions show burst number as function of burst length for 1 day in week 9 (left) and week 14 (right) for muscle activities exceeding 5%, 20%, 50% and 90% of the peak-EMG. For clarity, only bursts up to 0.4 s are shown.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter