First published online May 24, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2055-2062 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01602
Influence of local adaptation and interstock hybridization on the cardiovascular performance of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides
Steven J. Cooke* and
David P. Philipp
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences,
University of Illinois, and Center for Aquatic Ecology, Illinois Natural
History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, USA

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Effects of water temperature and stock on the resting cardiac performance
of largemouth bass. (A) Cardiac output; (B) heart rate; (C) stroke volume.
Asterisks indicate significantly different (P<0.05) values within
a stock at the two different temperatures. Dissimilar letters indicate
significantly different (P<0.05) values between stocks at each
temperature. Bold numbers represent stock-specific Q10 values for
all three cardiac variables. Additional details on the statistical tests are
given in Table 2. Values are
means ± 1 S.E.M. Sample sizes are
provided in Table 1.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Effects of water temperature and stock on the maximal cardiac performance
of largemouth bass. (A) Cardiac output; (B) heart rate; (C) stroke volume.
Asterisks indicate significantly different (P<0.05) values within
a stock at the two different temperatures. Dissimilar letters indicate
significantly different (P<0.05) values between stocks at each
temperature. Additional details on the statistical tests are given in
Table 2. Values are means
± 1 S.E.M. Sample sizes are provided
in Table 1.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Effects of water temperature and stock on the recovery of cardiac variables
of largemouth bass following exhaustive exercise. Asterisks indicate
significantly different (P<0.05) values within a stock at the two
different temperatures. Dissimilar letters indicate significantly different
(P<0.05) values between stocks at each temperature. Additional
details on the statistical tests are given in
Table 2. Values are means
± 1 S.E.M. Sample sizes are provided
in Table 1.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005