spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 9, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1295-1303 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00883
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Donald, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Donald, J. A.

Nitric oxide control of the dorsal aorta and the intestinal vein of the Australian short-finned eel Anguilla australis

Brett L. Jennings*, Brad R. S. Broughton and John A. Donald

School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia, 3217



View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Photomicrographs showing whole-mount preparations of eel dorsal aorta (A,C) and rat aorta (B,D) following processing for NADPH diaphorase histochemistry (A,B) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) immunohistochemistry (C,D). In the rat aorta, punctate eNOS-positive staining (arrowheads) occurred around the nuclei (arrows) of the endothelial cells, which was demonstrable with both techniques (B,D). In contrast, no eNOS-positive staining was observed around the nuclei of the endothelial cells in the eel dorsal aorta (A,C). Scale bars, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (142K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Photomicrographs showing whole-mount preparations of eel dorsal aorta (A,C) and intestinal vein (B,D) following processing for NADPH diaphorase histochemistry (A,B) and neural nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) immunohistochemistry (C,D). Using both techniques a plexus of nNOS-positive perivascular nerve bundles (white arrows) was observed in the outer layers of the wall of each vessel. In addition, some larger nNOS-positive nerve bundles (B, arrowheads) were observed. Within the nerve bundles, nNOS-positive cell bodies were observed (B, black arrow). Inset, high power magnification of a nerve cell body. Scale bars, 100 µm.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A) Tension recording showing the vasodilatory effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on the intestinal vein. The vessels were preconstricted with endothelin-1 (ET-1; 10–8 mol l–1) and at the point of maximum constriction, SNP (10–4 mol l–1) was added, which caused a marked dilation. Similar results were observed in the dorsal aorta. (B) Mean responses (% vasodilation) of preconstricted dorsal aorta and intestinal vein to SNP (10–4 mol l–1; N=5).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A) Tension recording showing the vasodilatory effect of nicotine on the dorsal aorta. The vessels were preconstricted with endothelin-1 (ET-1; 10–8 mol l–1) and at the point of maximum constriction, nicotine (3x10–4 mol l–1) was added, which caused a marked dilation. Similar results were observed in the intestinal vein. (B) Mean responses (% vasodilation) of preconstricted dorsal aorta and intestinal vein to nicotine (3x10–4 mol l–1; N=5).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Tension recordings from the intestinal vein showing the vasodilatory effect of nicotine (A) and its effect in the presence of the soluble guanylyl cyclase (GC) inhibitor ODQ (B) and the NOS inhibitor, L-NNA (C). Vessels were pre-incubated with ODQ (10–5 mol l–1) or L-NNA (10–4 mol l–1) for approximately 10 minprior to being constricted with endothelin-1 (ET-1; 10–8 mol l–1). No response was observed following the addition of nicotine (3x10–4 mol l–1) or SNP (10–4 mol l–1) to vessels incubated with ODQ. In contrast, the vessel dilated following the addition of rat ANP (10–8 mol l–1), which mediates its effect through a particulate GC, indicating that nicotine mediates its vasodilatory effect through the soluble GC. Following maximal constriction in the vessel preincubated with L-NNA, nicotine (3x10–4 mol l–1) was administered, but no vasodilatory effect was observed. Following this, the NOS independent NO donor, SNP (10–4 mol l–1), was added to the vessels, resulting in a marked vasodilation, suggesting that nicotine stimulates the production of NO via NOS to mediate vasodilation. Similar results were observed in the dorsal aorta (N=5). For abbreviations, see List.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Tension recordings showing the vasodilatory effect of nicotine on the dorsal aorta with an intact endothelium (A) and without an endothelium (B). Vessels were pre-constricted with endothelin-1 (ET-1; 10–8 mol l–1), and at the point of maximal vasoconstriction nicotine (3x10–4 mol l–1) was administered. Similar results were observed in the intestinal vein. (C) Mean response (% vasodilation) of nicotine on pre-constricted dorsal aorta and intestinal vein with the endothelium removed (filled bars) and with an intact endothelium (open bars). Note that there is no significant difference in the nicotine-mediated dilation (dorsal aorta, P=0.944; intestinal vein, P=0.902; N=5).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Tension recordings from the dorsal aorta showing the vasodilatory effect of nicotine (A), and its effect in the presence of the specific nNOS inhibitor N{omega}-propyl-L-arginine (PLA) (B). Vessels were pre-incubated with PLA (10–5 mol l–1) for approximately 10 min prior to being pre-constricted with endothelin-1 (ET-1; 10–8 mol l–1). At the point of maximal vasoconstriction, nicotine (3x10–4 mol l–1) was added. Note that the vasodilation is reduced in the presence of PLA. (C) Mean response (% vasodilation) of nicotine on pre-constricted dorsal aorta and intestinal vein in the in the presence of (filled bars) and in the absence of PLA (open bars). Note that PLA significantly reduced the nicotine-mediated dilation (dorsal aorta and intestinal vein, P<0.05; *denotes significant difference; N=5).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Tension recordings from the dorsal aorta showing the vasodilatory effect of nicotine (A) and its effect in the presence of the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (B). Vessels were preincubated with indomethacin (10–5 mol l–1) for approximately 10 min prior to being pre-constricted with endothelin-1 (ET-1; 10–8 mol l–1). At the point of maximal vasoconstriction, nicotine (3x10–4 mol l–1) was administered. (C) Mean response (% vasodilation) of nicotine on pre-constricted dorsal aorta and intestinal vein in the absence of (filled bars) and in the presence of indomethacin (open bars). Note that there is no significant difference in the nicotine-mediated dilation (dorsal aorta, P=0.63; intestinal vein, P=0.20; N=5).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Tension recordings from the intestinal vein showing the vasodilatory effect of the calcium ionophore, A23187 (A), and its effect in the presence of the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (B), and in the absence of an intact endothelium (C). Vessels were pre-incubated with indomethacin (10–5 mol l–1) for approximately 10 min prior to being constricted with endothelin-1 (ET-1; 10–8 mol l–1), and at the point of maximal vasoconstriction, the ionophore (3x10–6 mol l–1) was added. Pre-incubation with indomethacin or disruption of the endothelium abolished the dilation induced by the addition of the ionophore (3x10–6 mol l–1; N=3).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004