spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 20, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1217-1227 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00867
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santos, C. R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Power, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santos, C. R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Power, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Isolation of a novel aquaglyceroporin from a marine teleost (Sparus auratus): function and tissue distribution

C. R. A. Santos1, M. D. Estêvão1, J. Fuentes1, J. C. R. Cardoso1, M. Fabra2, A. L. Passos1, F. J. Detmers3, P. M. T. Deen3, J. Cerdà2 and D. M. Power1,*

1 Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
2 Center of Aquaculture-IRTA, 43540-San Carlos de la Rapita, Tarragona, Spain
3 Department of Cell Physiology, University Medical Center St Radboud, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands



View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sea bream AQP cDNA and deduced amino acid sequence. Two MIP family signatures (NPA) were identified and are indicated in bold at positions 76 and 208. The six transmembrane domains predicted using the Kite and Doolittle method are underlined in italics.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) Osmotic water permeability (Pf), (B) apparent glycerol permeability () and (C) urea uptake of Xenopus oocytes expressing sbAQP. Oocytes were injected with 50 nl of water containing 10 ng cRNA of sbAQP or 50 nl of distilled water only (control oocytes) 48 h prior to the experiments. Pf and were calculated from the time course of osmotic swelling of the oocyte in a hyposmotic- or glycerol-containing medium and urea transport activity was measured by [14C]urea uptake. Values are means ± S.E.M. of 10 oocytes from different batches. ME, mercaptoethanol.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Northern blot of sbAQP expression. (Ai) sbAQP transcripts were expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, where it was most abundant in the hind-gut and rectum, with lower levels detected in the mid-gut. Two transcripts of 2 kb and 1.6 kb were identified in the gastrointestinal tract. A single 2 kb transcript was detected in the kidney. (Aii) The results of northern blot hybridisation with ß-actin. (B) From the semi-quantitative analysis of sbAQP expression (Ai) relative to that of ß-actin (Aii), the hind-gut and kidney were the tissues with the highest expression of sbAQP followed by the rectum and mid-gut. Hatched bars, 2 kb transcript; open bars, 1.6 kb transcript.

 


View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. In situ hybridisation localises sbAQP expression in the kidney, gills and gastrointestinal tract. sbAQP was highly expressed in some of the kidney tubules (A) and (C). In the gill, expression was detected along the length of the lamellae with the most intense signal present in the apical cellular region of lamellae (D,F) where the chloride cells (arrows) were localised (F). An intense expression was found in the hind-gut in cells localised in the lamina propria (G) and in cells (arrows) at the interface between the two muscle layers of the gut (I). No sbAQP expression was observed in the liver (J) or in tubules (arrowheads) in control sections of the kidney (B), gills (E) or gut (H). Scale bars, 1 µm. Asterisks indicate haem deposits in the kidney.

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Multiple sequence alignment of sbAQP, putative Fugu GLPs extracted in silico from the genome and GLP proteins selected to cover the principal groups. Species identification is indicated in Table 1. Fugu sequences (M00...) are identified by the scaffolds from which they were obtained. Identical sequences are highlighted in black. Dark and light tints indicate partial identity.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Consensus tree with corresponding bootstrap values (from sampling 1000 trees) obtained by Parsimony analysis of vertebrate GLP proteins using the sequence of Allium cepa (Ac) AQP1 as outgroup. sbAQP fails to cluster with any of the previously isolated GLPs and instead cluster with a gene predicted from the Fugu genome. Species identification is indicated in Table 1. Fugu sequences (M00...) are identified by the scaffolds from which they were obtained.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004