spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 22, 2003
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 527-533 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00783
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, S. S.

Future migratory behaviour predicted from premigratory levels of gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity in individual wild brown trout (Salmo trutta)

Christian Nielsen1,*, Kim Aarestrup2, Ulrik Nørum1 and Steffen S. Madsen1

1 Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
2 Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Vejlsøvej 39, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Premigratory gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and future migratory behaviour in wild brown trout from the two tributaries (River Granslev Aa and Haldum Brook) in (A) late February–early March (163 future migrants and 25 future residents) and (B) mid-April (60 future migrants and 15 future residents). The solid line in B indicates the probability of future migration as a function of premigratory gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, as determined by logistic regression analysis.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Premigratory gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and future migratory behaviour in wild brown trout from the mainstream (River Lille Aa) in early April (88 future migrants and 16 future residents). The solid line indicates the probability of future migration as a function of premigratory gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity, as determined by logistic regression analysis on mainstream data. For comparison, the broken line indicates the logistic regression curve for mid-April in the tributaries.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Premigratory gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and number of days from April sampling to migration (147 migrants in total from tributaries, River Granslev Aa and Haldum Brook, and mainstream, River Lille Aa). The solid line indicates the non-significant (P=0.31) linear regression curve.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Predicting migratory behaviour in wild brown trout in the mainstream (River Lille Aa). Numbers of predicted (broken lines) and actual (solid lines) future migrants and residents in the mainstream (River Lille Aa) as a function of threshold probability of migration (or threshold gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity), as predicted from the logistic regression equation relating premigratory gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity in mid-April and future migratory behaviour of wild brown trout from the two tributaries (Haldum Brook and River Granslev Aa).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004