First published online November 5, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 4175-4183 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01285
Swimming of larval zebrafish: finaxis coordination and implications for function and neural control
Dean H. Thorsen1,
Justin J. Cassidy1 and
Melina E. Hale1,2,3,*
1 Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago,
Chicago, IL 60637, USA
2 Committee on Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637,
USA
3 Committee on Computational Neuroscience, The University of Chicago,
Chicago, IL 60637, USA

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Fin and axial locomotion during slow swimming of the larval zebrafish. Fins
are actuated in alternating abductionadduction cycles. The axial muscle
bends the body with the same frequency as the fins so that one axial cycle
corresponds to one abductionadduction cycle of the fins. The timing of
fin abduction and adduction coincides with maximum axial bending. At 0 ms the
right fin is maximally abducted, ready to initiate adduction toward the body.
The left fin is in its adducted position against the body. At 10 ms
(mid-stroke), the right fin is adducting while the left is abducting. By 20 ms
the right fin is fully adducted while the left fin is at fully abducted. This
cycle is repeated with the right fin abducting forward and the left adducting
back.
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Slow and fast straight swimming of zebrafish larvae demonstrating the
distinct swimming gaits during straight swimming. (A) Average velocity across
one locomotor cycle, (B) distance traveled in a locomotor cycle, (C) duration
of a locomotor cycle, (D) Reynolds (Re) number. All comparisons are
significantly different (P<0.0001). All values are given as mean
of three trials for each of 10 individuals for slow (N=30) and five
individuals for fast swimming (N=15). All data consist of one
analyzed tail beat from a longer swimming event. Fish effects were present in
two individuals and were not correlated to length.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Coordination of the finaxis during slow swimming. (A) Duration of an
abductionadduction cycle. FE, fin cycle excluding refractory period;
FER, fin cycle including refractory period; TB, tail beat.
*Significantly different (P<0.05). (B) Duration of fin
abduction vs adduction (ms). Black bars, adduction; white bars,
abduction. EF1 is significantly different (P<0.05) from FE1 and
FE2. Values are plotted as mean ± S.E.M.
|
|

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Optical sections through pectoral fin muscle of an -actin transgenic
zebrafish expressing GFP. Rostral is to the left in all images. Pectoral fin
muscle is in the middle of the images. (A) Planar section through the abductor
muscle. (B) Adductor muscle (right) and cross section although abductor muscle
(left, with arrow), (C) Cross sections through the abductor muscle (left with
arrow) and adductor muscle (right), (D) Orientation of the muscle sections A
through C of the entire pectoral fin, (E) abductor muscle, (F) abductor muscle
and fin membrane. Scale bars, 50 µm.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Limbbody axis coordination illustrating the similarity in
limbaxis locomotor patterns among tetrapods and fishes. (A) Slow
swimming in 5 dpf larval zebrafish (N=10) and (B) fast swimming
(N=5), (C) running (N=16) and (D) walking (N=20)
for the salamander Dicamptodon tenebrosus (modified from
Ashley-Ross, 1994 ). Scale bar
in A,B, 20 ms; C,D, 100% of step cycle; LF, left fore foot/fin; RF, right fore
foot/fin. Standard errors are indicated. Black bars indicate fin/limb
extension. Fin adduction is followed by a short refractory period (open bars)
characterized by limb position indeterminably adjacent to body. Body bending,
represented as a wave form, and limb extension continues until maximum axial
curvature.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004