spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 23, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 3317-3327 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01143
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lema, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Nevitt, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lema, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Nevitt, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evidence that thyroid hormone induces olfactory cellular proliferation in salmon during a sensitive period for imprinting

Sean C. Lema* and Gabrielle A. Nevitt*

Center for Animal Behavior and Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, One Shields Avenue, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA



View larger version (135K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Section of the olfactory epithelium showing BrdU-ir in single and clustered cells. Positive staining appears as a black precipitate. (A) Typical round morphology of a BrdU-ir cell in the basal cell layer. (B) Elongated morphology typical of a BrdU-ir cell in the mid-apical cell layer. (C) An example of a BrdU-labeled cluster of four cells situated in the basal region of the epithelium. Labeled cells are black and appear to be in close juxtaposition to each other. Length bars (10 µm) distinguish the extent of the basal region in A, B and C. Scale bar in B, 10 µm.

 


View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Representative BrdU labeling in the olfactory epithelium of placebo fish (A-C) and T3-implanted fish (D-F). Photomicrographs are shown from six different individual fish. Scale bar, 40 µm.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Counts of BrdU-ir cells in the basal (A) and mid-apical (B) cell layers of the olfactory epithelium of T3-implanted (black bars) and placebo (gray bars) fish. Clustered and individual cells are considered separately in the first two columns, and together in the third column (`total cells'). Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Mann-Whitney U-tests: *P<0.05; **P<0.025.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The distribution of cluster sizes for each treatment group compared with a Poisson (random) distribution. The frequency of cluster sizes for the (A) T3-implanted group (black bars) and the (B) placebo group (black bars) compared with a frequency distribution generated by a truncated Poisson process (gray bars in A and B). Both distributions are significantly different from random (T3 implant, {chi}2=12.6697, P=0.0004; placebo, {chi}2=7.0978, P=0.008).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The distribution of cluster sizes from T3-implanted (black bars) and placebo (gray bars) groups. Distributions are not significantly different from each other ({chi}2=0.8289, P=0.9345).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. (A) Profiles of body mass (triangles) and standard length (circles) plotted against sampling date. Data are given as means ± S.E.M. Numbers of fish sampled are shown in parentheses. (B) Condition factor (see Materials and methods) plotted against sampling date. Data are plotted as means ± S.E.M. Sample sizes are identical to those shown in A. Condition factor significantly decreased during the sampling period, which is a trend associated with smolting (asterisks indicate significant difference at overall P<0.05 between dates, Tukey HSD test).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Profiles of plasma T4 (A) and T3 (B) across the parr-smolt transformation. Data are plotted as means ± S.E.M. Sample sizes for each date are shown in parentheses in A.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Mean number of BrdU-ir cells (per 100 µm lamella length) plotted against sampling date. Data are given as means ± S.E.M. Basal cell counts are indicated by red triangles; mid-apical cell counts are indicated by blue triangles. Data are superimposed on a plot of mean plasma T4 levels for each sampling date (black squares). Sample sizes for BrdU-ir cell data for each date are shown in parentheses.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Mean number of BrdU-ir cells (per 100 µm lamella length) plotted against mean plasma T4 levels for each sampling date. (A,B) Single and clustered BrdU-ir cells considered together. The data indicate a significant positive correlation in the basal cell layer (A) but not in the mid-apical cell layer (B), suggesting that T4-induced proliferation is restricted to the basal cell layer. (C,D) Single BrdU-ir cells only. The data show a significant positive correlation in the basal cell layer (C) but not in the mid-apical cell layer (D).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004