spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 2, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2777-2786 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01092
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Couldridge, V. C. K.
Right arrow Articles by van Staaden, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Couldridge, V. C. K.
Right arrow Articles by van Staaden, M. J.

Habitat-dependent transmission of male advertisement calls in bladder grasshoppers (Orthoptera; Pneumoridae)

Vanessa C. K. Couldridge* and Moira J. van Staaden

Department of Biological Sciences, and JP Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind and Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA



View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Map of South Africa showing the four biomes of interest and the locations of the field sites where the transmission experiments were conducted: 1, Springbok; 2, Citrusdal; 3, Kloof; 4, Bulwer. Lines within South Africa indicate provincial boundaries.

 


View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Sonogram exemplars of species-specific male mate location signals for seven bladder grasshopper taxa used in the transmission experiments.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cross correlation coefficients (means ± S.E.M.) at a recording distance of 100 m in four transmission habitats and at three recording heights. Species are grouped according to their native habitats. Letters above error bars (a–c) indicate significance individually within each plot, with different letters representing a significant difference at the 5% level and the same letter indicating no significant difference.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Amplitude measurements (means ± S.E.M.) at a recording distance of 100 m in four transmission habitats and at three recording heights. At this distance, attenuation due to spherical spreading alone theoretically results in an amplitude of 56.4 dB. Species are grouped according to their native habitats. Letters above error bars (a–c) indicate significance individually within each plot, with different letters representing a significant difference at the 5% level and the same letter indicating no significant difference.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Standard deviations of cross correlation coefficients plotted over distance at three different heights above the ground in four different habitats.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Standard deviations of amplitude measurements (mean ± S.D.) plotted over distance at three different heights above the ground in four different habitats.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Power spectra of environmental noise in the four different habitats where transmission experiments were performed. The dotted lines represent the carrier frequencies of the signals of species native to that habitat.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004