spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 7, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2487-2496 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01035
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gatellier, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kanzaki, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gatellier, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kanzaki, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Serotonin modifies the sensitivity of the male silkmoth to pheromone

Laureline Gatellier1, Takashi Nagao2 and Ryohei Kanzaki3,*

1 Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
2 Human Information Systems, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 3-1 Yakkaho, Matto, Ishikawa 924-0838, Japan
3 Department of Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Experimental set-up. Four moths were placed in a closed box. Pheromone was applied through a 2 mm-diameter hole with a Pasteur pipette containing a piece of filter paper bearing pheromone. The pheromone stimulus was controlled by an electronic stimulator through a three-way solenoid valve, and an LED connected to the electronic stimulator flashed for the duration of the stimulus. The moths' response to pheromone and the LED flash were recorded with a CCD camera.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effects of serotonin on the behavioral response of the male moth to different concentrations of artificial pheromone. 4 µl of 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin were applied to the desheathed brain 3 min before pheromone exposure. Sample size: control (N=76), serotonin (N=73), wash (N=75). Serotonin shifted the curve to the left; its effect was higher than the control and the wash (GLM, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of serotonin antagonists on the behavioral response of the male moth to different concentrations of artificial pheromone. 4 µl of the drug were applied to the desheathed brain 3 min before pheromone exposure. Both drugs shifted the curve to the right (GLM, P<0.05), decreasing significantly the behavioral response in comparison with the control. (A) Mianserin at 10-4 mol l-1. Sample size: control (N=65), mianserin (N=64), wash (N=60). (B) Ketanserin at 10-3 mol l-1. Sample size: control (N=84), ketanserin (N=82), wash (N=34).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Daily variation of the male B. mori's behavior to different concentrations of artificial pheromone. Period during which the light was turned off is indicated by a gray bar along the x-axis. The N values for each group varied between 41 and 88. Around noon (10.00 h and 12.00 h),moths showed highest sensitivity to pheromone, significantly higher than during scotophase (GLM, P<0.05). The daily behavioral response to pheromone was strongly correlated to the daily variation of serotonin in the moth's brain (Fig. 7) (Pearson correlation coefficient: >0.90 for 0.1 ng, 0.5 ng and 1 ng).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Difference of means between the percentage of moths that responded to pheromone before and after three different concentrations of serotonin application. Values are means ± S.E.M. Sample size: 10-5 mol l-1 (N=129), 10-4 mol l-1 (N=73), 10-3 mol l-1 (N=60). The asterisk indicates significant difference (GLM, P<0.05); ns, non-significant.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Difference of means between the percentage of moths responding to pheromone before and after serotonin antagonist application. Values are means ± S.E.M. Sample size: 10-4 mol l-1 mianserin (N=64), 10-3 mol l-1 ketanserin (N=82), 10-4 mol l-1 ketanserin (N=84). Asterisks indicate significant difference (GLM, P<0.05); ns, non-significant.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Serotonin levels in the silkmoth's protocerebrum and antennal lobe (AL) after application of different concentrations of serotonin (10-5 mol l-1, 10-4 mol l-1 and 10-3 mol l-1). 4 µl of serotonin were applied to the desheathed brain 3 min before measurement with HPLC. Values are means ± S.E.M. Sample size: control (N=18), 10-5 mol l-1 serotonin (N=18), 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin (N=25), 10-3 mol l-1 serotonin (N=26), wash for 10-4 mol l-1 serotonin (N=9), wash for 10-3 mol l-1 serotonin (N=9). Differences between bars marked with the same letters were not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Serotonin levels (+S.E.M.) in the brain (protocerebrum, antennal lobe and optic lobe) of B. mori exposed to a 16 h:8 hlight:dark cycle, at different time points over 24 h. The period during which the light was turned off is indicated by a gray bar along the x-axis. The N values for each group varied between 6 and 9. There was a circadian variation of serotonin in the brain (one-way ANOVA, P<0.05).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004