spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 7, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2401-2408 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01043
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durier, V.
Right arrow Articles by Collett, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durier, V.
Right arrow Articles by Collett, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Switching destinations: memory change in wood ants

Virginie Durier*, Paul Graham and Thomas S. Collett{dagger}

Sussex Centre for Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagram showing the relative positions of the start of the trajectory, the cylinders (black circles) and the two feeding sites (F1 and F2). The directions of the first (b) and second (c) segments of a path and the direction of the path until the turn (a) are shown superimposed upon a trajectory recorded during training to F2. The turn is where the trajectory abruptly changes direction towards F2. The turn's magnitude is shown by the angle {theta} and its direction relative to F2 by the angle {varphi}.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Trajectories of two ants (A and B) after the sucrose has been switched from F1 to F2. Each trajectory is labelled with its trial number relative to the switch from F1 to F2. F1 is denoted by the filled cross and F2 by the open cross. Dots on each trajectory are placed 10 s apart.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Lack of correlation between the directions of the first and second segments. The directions of the first and second segments with respect to the direction of F2 from the start and from the turn, respectively ({alpha} and ß in inset), are plotted against each other for successive blocks of 10 trials after the switch. (A) Paths 1–10: N=70, mean X=30.47±3.26°, mean Y=3.71±15.62°, direction of principal axis=92.08°. (B) Paths 11–20: N=102, mean X=26.47±3.435°, mean Y=–7.79±14.355°, direction of principal axis=89.98°. (C) Paths 21–30: N=86, mean X=25.38±2.78°, mean Y=–7.62±6.9°, direction of principal axis=80.23°. The closeness of the principal axis to 90° indicates a lack of correlation between the directions of the two segments.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Trajectories to a food site from displaced (D1, D2, D3) and training (T) start points. For clarity, not all the recorded trajectories are plotted. We show 13, 13, 10 and 13 releases from sites D1–D3 and T, respectively, and the mean vectors of all the first segments (grey arrows). Mean vectors are measured with respect to the direct line between each starting point and the food site. The direction and 95% confidence interval of each mean vector are D1: 4.76±6.61°, r=0.95, N=30; T: –2.20±6.62°, r=0.94, N=34; D2: 11.9±7.82°, r=0.93, N=29; D3: 14.4±18.4°, r=0.87, N=13. Data come from 12 ants. Solid black circles indicate cylinders, and F indicates the food site. Food was removed during these tests.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Characteristics of the second segment. (A) Direction of second segment measured with respect to the direct path from the turn to F2 (angle {varphi} in Fig. 1). Histograms plot the direction of the second segment in 5° bins for successive blocks of 10 trials after the switch. 0° on the abscissa marks the direct path to F2. N gives the number of data points in each histogram with data pooled across ants and trials. Paths are only included when there is a turn. % shows the proportion of trials with a turn. The direction of the second segment changed over training (Kruskal–Wallis test: {chi}2=22.9, d.f.=2, P<0.001). Accuracy improved between the first and the second blocks of trials but not afterwards (Mann–Whitney test: first block vs second block, z=–3.965, P<0.001; second block vs third block, z=–0.437, P=0.662). (B) Similar histograms showing changes in the distance of the turn from the ant's starting position. The distance between the start and the turn decreased as training progressed (Kruskal–Wallis test: {chi}2=58.3, d.f.=2, P<0.001; Mann–Whitney test: first block vs second block, z=–2.861, P=0.004; second block vs third block, z=–5.587, P<0.001). (C) Histogram showing the direction of the second segment measured with respect to the direct path between F1 and F2, for all those segments from trial 11–30 that were aimed within ±20° of F2. 0° on the abscissa is the direction from F1 to F2. Here and elsewhere, positive angles are counterclockwise.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Coarse categorisation of all recorded trajectories after the switch. The three columns show the first, second and third blocks of 10 trials. Each column is divided into the percentage of first segments that are aimed (1) within 20° either side of F1, (2) aimed neither at F1 nor at F2 – a category that is only 5° wide and (3) aimed within 20° of F2. The first two categories are further subdivided into those trajectories in which the second segment is aimed at F2 and those in which it is not.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Routes performed from novel starting points. (A) Examples of routes with ants started at positions D1 and D2 rather than from their usual start position at T. (B) Routes with ants started at D3. (C) Diagram to show the angular difference between the direction of the second segment and the direction from the turn to F2 (the angle {varphi} in Fig. 1) with the trajectory either shifted as though the ant had started at T or with no shift of the trajectory. (D) For each trial with a turn, {varphi} with no shift is plotted against {varphi} with shift. This plot pools data from ants started at D1 and D2.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004