spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 24, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2289-2295 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01018
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Remold, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Remold, S. K.

Differences in the effects of salinity on larval growth and developmental programs of a freshwater and a euryhaline mosquito species (Insecta: Diptera, Culicidae)

Thomas M. Clark1,*, Benjamin J. Flis1 and Susanna K. Remold2

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Indiana University, South Bend, IN 46634-1700, USA
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Osborn Memorial Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effects of salinity on successful pupation rates of larval Aedes aegypti (solid line) and Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus (broken line). N=3 replicates/species, each replicate consisting of 20 larvae/salinity for a total sample size of 360 larvae of each species. Data are expressed as raw means ± S.E.M. for the percent survival of the 3 replicate runs.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effects of salinity, species and sex on duration of the larval stage in those Aedes aegypti (solid line) and Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus (broken line) surviving to pupation. Males, filled symbols; females, open symbols. Sample sizes of surviving larvae were as follows: A. aegypti: 188 males, 153 females; O. taeniorhynchus: 149 males, 123 females. Data are expressed as raw means ± S.EM.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effects on salinity, species and sex on pupal mass of Aedes aegypti (solid line) and Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus (broken line) surviving to pupation. Effects on (A) wet mass and (B) dry mass. Males, filled symbols; females, open symbols. Sample sizes are as in Fig. 2 legend. Data are expressed as raw means ± S.E.M.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of salinity, species and sex on growth rate of Aedes aegypti (solid line) and Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus (broken line) surviving to pupation. Effects on (A) growth rate (wet mass), (B) growth rate (dry mass). Males, filled symbols; females, open symbols. Sample sizes are as in Fig. 2 legend. Data are expressed as raw means ± S.E.M.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Path diagrams of the relationship among salinity, growth parameters and final pupal dry mass in Aedes aegypti and Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus. Solid lines indicate positive and broken lines negative path coefficients; the values of the path coefficients are indicated by line thickness. Coefficients that are not significant at P<0.05 are not shown. U, unexplained variance. The univariate (net) coefficient describing the overall effect of salinity on pupal dry mass is shown by the vertical arrows at far left of the figure.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004