spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 13, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2173-2184 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01003
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rheault, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rheault, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organic cation transport by Malpighian tubules of Drosophila melanogaster: application of two novel electrophysiological methods

Mark R. Rheault* and Michael J. O'Donnell

Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Canada L8S 4K1



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Representative scan of tetraethylammonium (TEA) flux at locations along the secretory segment of the Malpighian tubule (MT) and the lower MT (LMT). Tubules were bathed in saline containing 100 µmol l–1 TEA. The common ureter and part of the other LMT of the pair are shown. The tip of the TEA-SeR microelectrode is located just above the asterisk. The image is a collage formed from two images. At each site, indicated by arrowheads, ASET software calculated the TEA-specific signal differences ({Delta}V; µV) between the two limits of microelectrode excursion by subtracting the voltage at the outer limit of the excursion from that measured at the inner limit. The length of each arrow corresponds to the magnitude of TEA influx. (B) TEA influx as a function of distance from the ureter along lower, main and distal segments of the MT. An influx of TEA reduces TEA concentration in the unstirred layer adjacent to the surface of the tissue, and the corresponding voltage difference is therefore negative. Distance 0 on the abscissa corresponds to the junction of the ureter and the LMT. Both the differential signal recorded by the TEA-SeR microelectrode (right ordinate) and the calculated TEA influx (left ordinate) are shown (N=4).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Temporal stability of tetraethylammonium (TEA) influx recorded at a single site in the lower Malpighian tubule (LMT) on each of two tubules (circles, squares). Tubules were bathed in saline containing 100 µmol l–1 TEA. Each point is the mean of three measurements at the same site at intervals of 2.5 min.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A) Representative scan of tetraethylammonium (TEA) flux at locations along the lower Malpighian tubule (LMT) and ureter. Tubules were bathed in saline containing 100 µmol l–1 TEA. The length of each arrow corresponds to the magnitude of TEA influx and the axis of each arrow indicates the axis of the TEA-SeR microelectrode's movement. (B) TEA influx (left ordinate) and differential signal (right ordinate) in the LMT, distal ureter and proximal ureter. The proximal ureter is defined as the 50% of the ureter length closest to the gut. Each bar shows mean + S.E.M. for N=6 preparations.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Concentration–response curves for tetraethylammonium (TEA) influx in the (A) lower Malpighian tubule (LMT), (B) Malpighian tubule main segment and (C) midgut. Each point is the mean ± S.E.M. of N=4–7 preparations. Values for Jmax and Kt were determined by non-linear regression analysis as described in the Materials and methods.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of bathing saline potassium concentration on tetraethylammonium (TEA) influx (left ordinate) and differential signal (right ordinate) in the (A) lower Malpighian tubule (LMT) and (B) Malpighian tubule main segment. LMTs were bathed in saline containing 10 or 100 mmol l–1 K+. Main segments were bathed in salines containing 20 or 2 mmol l–1 K+. All salines contained 100 µmol l–1 TEA. The height of each bar represents the mean + S.E.M. (N=4 main segments; N=7 LMTs). Asterisks denote significant differences (P<0.05) from the value of the bar to the immediate left.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effects of verapamil on tetraethylammonium (TEA) flux (left ordinate) and differential signal (right ordinate) in the lower, main and distal segments of the Malpighian tubule. Mean values + S.E.M. (N=5) are shown for the same tubules before (filled bars) and 20–30 min after (open bars) the addition of verapamil (5 µmol l–1) to saline containing 100 µmol l–1 TEA. The asterisk indicates a significant (P<0.05) reduction in TEA influx after the addition of verapamil.

 


View larger version (6K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Sample recording showing the change in electrical potential of a tetraethylammonium (TEA)-selective microelectrode positioned in droplets of secreted fluid or calibration solutions. Microelectrode voltage was sampled at 3 Hz by the data acquisition system. The labels 10, 1 and 0.1 refer to calibration solutions containing 10, 1 or 0.1 mmol l–1 TEA chloride, respectively, in Drosophila saline. BG refers to the background voltage recorded due to endogenously secreted compounds in the absence of TEA. W1 and W2 refer to secreted droplets collected from a pair of whole tubules after the addition of TEA. M1 and M2 refer to secreted droplets collected from the main segment of one of the same pair of tubules after the addition of TEA. All tubules were exposed to 100 µmol l–1 TEA in the bathing saline.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Concentration–response curves for secreted fluid TEA concentration as a function of bathing saline TEA concentration for the main segment (A) and whole tubule (B). Concentration–response curves for TEA flux as a function of bathing saline TEA concentration for the main segment (C) and whole tubule (D). Each point shows the mean ± S.E.M. for N=6–16 main segments or 3–8 whole tubules. The insets in the upper panels reflect the corresponding arrangements of the tubules and bathing droplets. A droplet of secreted fluid (SF) is indicated by the open circle. Abbreviations U, ureter; D, distal segment; M, main segment; L, lower segment.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Effects of (A) 0.1 mmol l–1 and (B) 1.0 mmol l–1 cimetidine on secreted fluid [TEA] for whole Malpighian tubules. Tubules were bathed in saline alone for the first 20 min. Either 0.1 mmol l–1 TEA (open symbols) or cimetidine (filled symbols) was added at 20 min. At 60 min either cimetidine (open symbols) or 0.1 mmol l–1 TEA (filled symbols) was added.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004