spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 23, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1941-1951 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00973
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latz, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rohr, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Latz, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rohr, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Hydrodynamic stimulation of dinoflagellate bioluminescence: a computational and experimental study

Michael I. Latz1,*, Andrew R. Juhl1,{dagger}, Abdel M. Ahmed2, Said E. Elghobashi2 and Jim Rohr1,3

1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0202, USA
2 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
3 SSC San Diego, 53560 Hull Street, D363, San Diego, CA 92152, USA



View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Imaging of luminescent response of cells of Lingulodinium polyedrum for Re=5100. A composite of several video frames shows responses for five cells superimposed on a view of the nozzle. Each streak represents the trajectory of a single flash response.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Map of the nozzle flow field for numerical simulations at Re=5100 showing color contours of fluid shear stress (left half) and acceleration (right half).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Downstream position of flash initiation (X1) by Lingulodinium polyedrum (filled symbols) and Ceratocorys horrida (open symbols) as a function of Reynolds number of the flow. Symbols represent median values with minimum and maximum range for approximately 40 cells at each flow. C. horrida responded at lower flow rates, and flashes were typically located further upstream than for L. polyedrum.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Flow conditions, based on numerical simulations, at the position (X0, Y0) of stimulated cells of Lingulodinium polyedrum for cell suspension experiments. Each point represents the results for a single cell; approximately 40 cells were analyzed for each flow rate. Filled symbols are for Re=800 while open symbols are for Re=5100. (A) Position of stimulated cells. Curved line represents the position of the wall. (B) Fluid acceleration. The broken line represents a value of zero acceleration. (C) Fluid shear stress.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Flow conditions, based on numerical simulations, at the position (X0, Y0) of stimulated cells of Ceratocorys horrida for cell suspension experiments. Filled symbols are for Re=400 while open symbols are for Re=5100. (A) Position of stimulated cells. Curved line represents the position of the wall. (B) Fluid acceleration. The broken line represents a value of zero acceleration. (C) Fluid shear stress.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Relative fluid shear stress and acceleration at the position (X0, Y0) of stimulated cells of Lingulodinium polyedrum (closed symbols) and Ceratocorys horrida (open symbols). Relative values were calculated as the ratio of the flow parameter at the position of a stimulated cell to the maximum value of that parameter for any Y at that downstream (X0) position in the flow field. Boxes and circles are for relative shear stress and acceleration, respectively. Values represent means ± S.E.M. for approximately 40 cells at each flow condition.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Response of cells of Lingulodinium polyedrum injected at the nozzle inlet at various radial positions for Re=2500. A radial injection position of 1 is at the inlet wall (=Yin) while a value of zero is at centerline. Symbols represent mean values ± S.D. (A) Proportion of cells responding, based on approximately 7 cells injected s-1; cells injected at <0.6Yin did not respond. All stimulated cells were located downstream within the thin wall boundary layer. (B) Relative fluid shear stress and acceleration at the position of stimulated cells (X0, Y0).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004