spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 23, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1797-1802 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00951
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shreve, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shreve, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. E., Jr

Preservation of reproductive behaviors during modest cooling: rapid cold-hardening fine-tunes organismal response

Scott M. Shreve1, Jonathan D. Kelty2 and Richard E. Lee, Jr1,*

1 Department of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
2 Department of Biology, 230A Brooks Hall, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859, USA



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Comparison of the reproductive activity of control versus rapidly cold-hardened (RCH) D. melanogaster tested at 16°C. Immediately prior to the mating trial, RCH pairs (N=20) were acclimated to 16°C for 2 h, while control pairs (N=22) were transferred from 23°C to 16°C immediately prior to the 1-h observation period. Asterisks denote significant differences from control ({chi}2, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Reciprocal test to determine whether rapid cold-hardening (RCH) at 16°C reduced mating performance at the original rearing temperature of 23°C. RCH pairs (N=19) were acclimated at 16°C for 2 h immediately prior to a 1-h mating trial. Control pairs (N=20) were held continuously at 23°C prior to the mating trial.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Comparison of metabolic rate of D. melanogaster, as measured by CO2 production, for control flies at 23°C and 16°C, and rapidly cold-hardened (RCH) flies at 16°C after a brief exposure (~5 min) to 23°C. Error bars represent ± S.E.M. Bars with different letters are significantly different (Bonferroni multiple comparisons test, P<0.0001).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004