spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 23, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1771-1778 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00946
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lohmann, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lohmann, K. J.

Navigation and seasonal migratory orientation in juvenile sea turtles

Larisa Avens1,2,* and Kenneth J. Lohmann1

1 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA
2 NOAA Fisheries, Beaufort, NC 28516-9722, USA



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Map of the coastal areas of North Carolina indicating the location of the testing site (NOAA Laboratory) and the locations where turtles were captured.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Diagram of the experimental arena and the data acquisition system used to monitor the orientation of juvenile sea turtles (turtle not drawn to scale). Each turtle was outfitted with a nylon–LycraTM harness and tethered to a rotatable arm in the arena. The data acquisition computer was located in a shed approximately 5 m to the south of the arena. See text for details.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Summer and autumn orientation of juvenile loggerhead turtles. Each dot within a circular diagram represents the mean angle of orientation for a single turtle during its 10-min trial. Triangles on the outsides of the circles correspond to the most direct routes back to the capture areas for each group of turtles. The broken lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the mean heading. (A) Orientation of loggerheads captured at locations east–northeast of the test site and tested between May and September 1998–2001. Turtles were significantly oriented with a mean angle of 83° (N=122, r=0.29, P<0.0005 V-test, 95% confidence interval ±25°). The confidence interval overlaps the direction to the capture area (74°). (B) Orientation of loggerheads captured at locations west–southwest of the test site and tested between May and September 1999–2002. Turtles were significantly oriented with a mean angle of 271° (N=11, r=0.43, P<0.05 V-test, 95% confidence interval ±76°). The confidence interval overlaps the direction to the capture site (255°). (C) Autumn orientation of loggerheads tested in October and November 1998–2000. Turtles were significantly oriented with a mean angle of 190° (N=15, r=0.61, P<0.005 Rayleigh test, 95% confidence interval ±33°). This direction coincides with the direction of orientation exhibited by wild turtles during their autumn migration.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Summer and autumn orientation of juvenile green turtles. Each dot within a circular diagram represents the mean angle of orientation for a single turtle during its 10-min trial. The triangle on the outside of each circle corresponds to the direction towards the capture area for each group of turtles. The broken lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the mean angle. (A) Orientation of green turtles tested between May and September 1998–1999. Turtles were significantly oriented with a mean angle of 50° (N=9, r=0.71, P<0.0025 V-test, 95% confidence interval ±37°). The confidence interval overlaps the direction to the capture site (74°). (B) Autumn orientation of green turtles tested in October and November 1998 and 2001. Turtles were significantly oriented with a mean angle of 199° (N=7, r=0.76, P<0.02 Rayleigh test, 95% confidence interval ±39°). This direction of orientation is consistent with that observed in wild turtles during the autumn migration.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004