spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 24, 2003
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 67-74 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00716
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Federle, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hölldobler, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Federle, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hölldobler, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: frictional forces are rate- and temperature-dependent

Walter Federle1,*, Werner Baumgartner2 and Bert Hölldobler1

1 Zoologie II, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany
2 Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, Koellikerstrasse 6, D-97070 Würzburg, Germany



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. (A) Measurement of contact area of the extended arolium in O. smaragdina. The arrow shows the sliding direction. Scale bar, 100 µm. (B) Scaling of pad contact area (mean of two hind legs, µm2) with body mass (mg). A model II regression was performed.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. (A) Video image of an O. smaragdina ant on the Plexiglas turntable rotating at 2470 revs min-1. Dotted arrow shows the sliding trajectory. Note the two hindlegs in contact. (B) Gradual slide of O. smaragdina ant on a smooth turntable at 20°C. (C) Relationship between friction force and velocity for the data shown in B; model II regression. (D) Plot of regression residuals.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of static and dynamic friction in O. smaragdina. (A) Static shear stress. (B) Velocity-dependent increase of shear stress. Values are means ± S.D. of 13 ants at 15°C and 16 ants at 30°C (mean of 2 'slides' each).

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Temperature dependence of perpendicular detachment forces in O. smaragdina. N=15 ants were tested at each temperature (maximum of three runs per ant). Central horizontal lines denote medians, boxes denote the inner two quartiles, and whiskers mark maxima and minima.

 


View larger version (6K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Simple 'wet adhesion' model of insect adhesive contact. (A) Liquid film of constant height between the pad and the surface forming a meniscus. (B) When the pad slides (arrow), the meniscus is deformed, resulting in different contact angles {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 at the leading and trailing edges of the pad.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004