spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burt, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burt, M. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Freshwater environment affects growth rate and muscle fibre recruitment in seawater stages of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

Ian A. Johnston1,*, Sujatha Manthri1, Richard Alderson2, Alistair Smart3, Patrick Campbell2, David Nickell4, Billy Robertson3, Charles G. M. Paxton5 and M. Louise Burt5

1 Gatty Marine Laboratory, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY16 8LB, UK
2 BioMar Ltd, North Shore Road, Grangemouth Docks, Grangemouth, Scotland, FK3 8UL, UK
3 Marine Harvest Scotland Ltd, Craigcrook Castle, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 3TU, UK
4 Roche Vitamins Ltd, Heanor, Derbyshire, England, DE75 7SG, UK
5 Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY16 9LZ, UK



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The temperature regime experienced by the ambient (open circles) and heated (filled circles) treatment groups of Atlantic salmon.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The growth performance of fish from the ambient (open circles; N=206) and heated (filled circles; N=298) treatment groups of Atlantic salmon. The values represent means ± S.D. NS, no significant difference between treatments.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Fit of the growth model to the observed data of body mass in seawater. In the figure, y is plotted against x2, where y=(Mt+t'1-ß-Mt1-ß)/(1-ß) and x2=t'(T-Tavg). The variables are defined in Table 2. Black dots represent observed values for the ambient group, red dots represent observed values for the heated group, and the fitted values of y from model 5 are shown in green. The values have been offset slightly along the x-axis so that they can be seen more clearly.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Histograms of y for each growth period (i.e. period 1 is between 4 April 2000 and 31 May 2000, period 2 is between 31 May 2000 and 10 July 2000, etc.; see text for further details).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The number of fast muscle fibres per trunk cross-section (FN) for the ambient (open circles) and heated (filled circles) treatment groups of Atlantic salmon. (A). The relationship between FN and age post-fertilisation for the randomly sampled fish. The numbers in brackets represent the number of fish sampled for the ambient and heated groups, respectively. The arrow shows the age at which smolts were transferred to seawater cages (SWT). (B) The relationship between FN and the total cross-sectional area (TCA) of fast muscle at the level of the first dorsal fin ray. The values represent means ± S.E.M. Fish were selected at random, except for the last two samples (box), which represents a selection of the largest individuals available in each cage. The numbers in brackets represent the number of fish sampled for the ambient and heated groups, respectively.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The distribution of muscle fibre diameter in the fast myotomal muscle of Atlantic salmon: (A) the final sample of the ambient treatment group sampled 988 days post-fertilisation; (B) the final sample of the heated treatment group sampled 997 days post-fertilisation. Smooth distributions were fitted to 800 measurements of fibre diameter per fish using a nonparametric kernel function. The broken lines represent the probability density for individual fish, and the solid line represents the mean probability density function for each group.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The relationship between fibre number (FNmax) and individual growth rate ({alpha}) in fish that had completed fibre recruitment in the June 2001 samples. Filled and open symbols represent the heated and ambient treatments, respectively. A first-order linear regression was fitted to the data (r2=0.35; {alpha}=0.109+1.79x10-8 (FNmax)).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The mean probability density of muscle fibre diameter for heated (solid line) and ambient (dashed line) treatment groups for the first (A) and last (B) seawater samples taken in July 2000 and August 2001, respectively. The shaded polygon represents 100 bootstrap estimates of the combined populations of ambient and heated fish, and the dotted line represents the mean probability density function of the pooled groups. Regions where the mean probability density function fell outside the shaded polygon provided graphical evidence for a difference between the populations.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. The relationship between maximum fibre diameter (Dmax) and (A) age post-fertilisation and (B) body mass for the heated (filled circles) and ambient (open circles) treatment groups of Atlantic salmon. Values represent means ± S.E.M. The number of fish sampled is as in Fig. 5A.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. The rate of muscle fibre hypertrophy of fast muscle fibres between successive sample points plotted against seawater growth in Atlantic salmon from the heated (filled circles) and ambient (open circles) treatment groups. The rate of hypertrophy has been plotted at the midpoint of the time period over which it was calculated. Values represent the mean of the difference between the observed fibre diameter and the mean value of the fibre diameter in the preceding sample.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. The nuclear content of isolated muscle fibres. (A) A fast muscle fibre stained with the fluorescent DNA stain Sytox green. The confocal image represents a projection of 1 µm sections through the fibre. (B) The number of myonuclei in single muscle fibres of 1 cm length in relation to muscle fibre diameter. Open circles represent the ambient group and filled circles represent the heated group. The lines represent linear regressions (see text for details).

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. (A,B) Immunohistochemistry showing sections of salmon fast myotomal muscle double-stained with primary antibodies to laminin and c-met using Cy-3 as the secondary antibody and Sytox green as a nuclear counterstain. Nuclei are stained green (white arrowheads), and c-met+ve cells (yellow arrows) and the basal lamina are stained red.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003