spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pyle, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pyle, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dietary sodium inhibits aqueous copper uptake in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

G. G. Pyle1,2,*, C. N. Kamunde2, D. G. McDonald2,3 and C. M. Wood2

1 Dept of Biology, Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, P1B 8L7, Canada
2 Dept of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
3 Dept of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. New copper uptake rate (as defined by equation 1) into rainbow trout fed for 7 days on diets ranging in sodium concentration after a subsequent 6 h exposure to 20 µg l-1 of waterborne copper. Bars represent means ± S.E.M., N=4-5. Asterisks represent significant difference from control (0.6%) diet (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Newly accumulated copper (as defined by equation 1) in gills, liver, kidney, blood plasma and gut (inset) of rainbow trout fed for 7 days on diets ranging in sodium concentration after a subsequent 6 h exposure to 20 µg l-1 of waterborne copper. Points represent means ± S.E.M., N=4-5. Asterisks represent significant difference from control (0.6%) diet (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total copper concentrations in gills (A) and livers (B) of rainbow trout fed for 7 days on diets ranging in sodium concentration after a subsequent 6 h exposure to 20 µg l-1 of waterborne copper. Points represent means ± S.E.M., N=4-5. Asterisks represent significant difference from control (0.6%) diet (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Total sodium concentrations in gut tissue and plasma of rainbow trout fed for 7 days on diets ranging in sodium concentration after a subsequent 6 h exposure to 20 µg l-1 of waterborne copper. Points represent means ± S.E.M., N=4-5. Asterisks represent significant difference from control (0.6%) diet (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Sodium influx, efflux and net flux rates into juvenile rainbow trout fed for 7 days on diets ranging in sodium concentration after a subsequent 6 h exposure to 20 µg l-1 of waterborne copper. Sodium influx rates were determined on individual fish, which facilitated the calculation of means and S.E.M. (bars; N=4-5) and statistical comparisons (asterisks indicate statistical significance at P<0.05). However, efflux rates were determined on groups of fish that precluded statistical comparisons among treatment groups for efflux or net flux data.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Branchial Na+/K+-ATPase activity in rainbow trout exposed to different feeding regimes and waterborne copper concentrations. Experimental treatments included feeding fish 3% of their total body mass per day on untreated food (`Fed') or feeding fish 3% of their total body mass per day on food that was supplemented with 3% sodium by mass (`Na Fed'). Fish were then exposed to either no copper in the water or to 20 µg l-1 of dissolved copper (Cu) for 6 h. Bars represent means ± S.E.M., N=5-6, bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different from one another (P>0.05).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. New sodium (A) and copper (B) accumulation (as defined by equation 1) in gills of rainbow trout exposed to a normal diet and no waterborne Cu (`Fed'), a normal diet and 20 µg l-1 waterborne Cu (`Fed+Cu') or a diet supplemented with 3% Na+ by mass and 20 µg l-1 waterborne Cu (`Na Fed+Cu'). Bars represent means ± S.E.M., N=5-6, bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different from one another (P>0.05).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Drinking rates in rainbow trout that were either starved (`Unfed'), fed 3% of their total mass on a normal diet (`Fed') or fed 3% of their total mass on a diet supplemented with 3% Na+ by mass (`Na Fed') for 7 days. Bars represent means ± S.E.M., N=5. Bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different from one another (P>0.05).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Conceptual model of sodium and copper regulation in chloride cells of rainbow trout gills, including a common apical channel shared between sodium and copper (broken line). As sodium absorbed from the diet accumulates in these cells, the apical channel is downregulated. This results in reduced sodium and copper uptake, which is thought to be the mechanism by which dietary sodium protects against waterborne copper exposure. Details are given in the text.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003