First published online November 10, 2003
Mechanisms of homing in the fiddler crab Uca rapax 1. Spatial and temporal characteristics of a system of small-scale navigation
John E. Layne*,
W. Jon P. Barnes and
Lindsey M. J. Duncan
Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of
Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ,
Scotland, UK

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. (AC) Three examples of natural foraging paths, digitized at 1 frame
s-1. (AiCi) Positions of transverse body axis of fiddler
crab, with the arrow pointing toward the `homeward' side, as seen in the boxed
inset in Ai, for each digitized frame. The boxed inset also shows the
convention for egocentric directions used throughout this paper. Numbers
correspond to elapsed time (s). The center of the carapace is connected
between frames. The burrow is the large open circle. Scale bars in Bi apply to
AiCi. The small gray circles in Ai adjacent to the burrow represent
calculated burrow positions for each digitized step, assuming the burrow
entrance were to lie directly in line with the crab's transverse axis on its
the homeward side (see Results for details). Open inset in Ai is a
diagrammatic representation of the orientation error (see below). The hatched
solid area in Ci is the base of a mangrove sapling. (AiiCii)
Orientation error (degrees), defined as bearing minus orientation (inset in
Ai), over time (s). The double-headed arrow in Cii indicates the time when the
burrow was blocked from view by a mangrove sapling. (AiiiCiii)
Frequency histogram showing the distribution of orientation errors in 1°
bins, with an ideal normal probability density function overlaid (solid
line).
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. (AC) Three examples of foraging paths performed with a barrier
(solid lines in AiCi) between crab and burrow, digitized at 1 frame
s-1. Horizontal arrows (AiiCii) indicate when the barrier
was between the crab and burrow. Conventions as in
Fig. 1.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Time-lagged cross correlation between change in orientation and change in
bearing. Data shown are from paths in Fig.
2A (open circles), Fig.
2B (filled circles), the Fisher z-transformed mean of
seven paths (filled triangles) and the 95% confidence interval (broken lines).
Correlation coefficient is plotted on the y-axis, lag on the
x-axis; a negative lag means change in bearing preceded a change in
orientation.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Results from experiments involving (A) covering the burrow, (B) radial
translational displacement and (C) tangential translational displacement. (A)
Data from three different crabs were overlaid and aligned with one burrow
entrance (filled gray circle); lines represent the center of each crab's
carapace. (B,C) Position of muddy, mobile acetate sheet before (solid
rectangles) and after (broken rectangles) displacement, with the sheets'
motion vectors indicated by gray arrows. Fictive burrow entrances (large open
circles) are found by adding this motion vector to the true burrow entrance
(gray filled circles). Lines represent the center of each crab's carapace, the
period during which the crabs were on a moving substrate being indicated by
connected black dots. In these figures, `start' indicates the beginning of the
digitized track; in A, only the homeward part of the crabs' tracks were
digitized, while in B and C both outward and homeward journeys were digitized.
Scale bar in C also applies to B.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. (A) Escape directions of foraging crabs in relation to the true home
direction and (B) the difference between escape and home direction in relation
to the crabs' orientation error at the start of the escape run. All directions
are in egocentric terms, and follow the convention in
Fig. 1A inset. The line of best
fit, calculated by the method of least squares, is shown in A.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Escape path of a crab having a large orientation error when it was
frightened. (A) crab's transverse body axis during foraging (black arrows) and
escape (gray arrows); it was frightened at t=65. Foraging behavior
was digitized at 1 frame s-1, while escape was digitized at 25
frames s-1. (B) Plot of egocentric running direction (dotted line)
and egocentric home direction (solid line) plotted against time during escape
(i.e. from 65 to 65.4 s); (C) Changes in orientation (body turns; solid line)
and changes in egocentric running direction (dotted line) during fast escape.
(D) Time course of running velocity of escaping crab (open circles) compared
to the similar time course for eight other escaping crabs (gray circle, broken
gray line shows ± S.D.). For correlating two behaviors in
time, it must be remembered that turns and running direction are first
derivatives of orientation (a position measurement), and change in running
direction is a second derivative of orientation. It then follows that, if
orientation has n observations, then turns and running direction have
n-1 observations, and change in running direction has n-2
observations. We therefore associate the `nth' turn or running
direction with the nth orientation (see running direction
vs. home direction in B), and the nth change in running
direction with the nth+1 turn (see running direction change
vs. orientation change in C).
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003