spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 10, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuson, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuson, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. W.

Adaptations to diving hypoxia in the heart, kidneys and splanchnic organs of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)

Amanda L. Fuson1,*, Daniel F. Cowan2, Shane B. Kanatous3, Lori K. Polasek1 and Randall W. Davis1

1 Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, 5007 Avenue U, Galveston, TX 77551, USA
2 Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0555, USA
3 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8573, USA



View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Representative electron micrographs from the heart of a harbor seal (A), dog (B) and rat (C). M, mitochondria; F, myofibers. Magnification is approximately 18 150x. Scale bar, 1 µm.

 


View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Representative electron micrographs from the liver of a harbor seal (A), dog (B) and rat (C). M, mitochondria; N, nucleus. Note the relatively homogeneous distribution of mitochondria in the seal liver, whereas the dog and rat liver display more clustering. Magnification is approximately 18 150x. Scale bar, 1 µm.

 


View larger version (99K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Representative electron micrographs from the kidney (cortex) of a harbor seal (A), dog (B) and rat (C). M, mitochondria; N, nucleus; R, red blood cell. Note the relatively homogeneous distribution of mitochondria in all three species. Magnification is approximately 18 150x. Scale bar, 1 µm.

 


View larger version (176K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Representative electron micrograph of the differential staining of mitochondria achieved in some kidney micrographs. M, mitochondria. Magnification is approximately 18 150x. Scale bar, 1 µm.

 


View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Representative electron micrographs from the stomach of a harbor seal (A), dog (B) and rat (C). M, mitochondria; N, nucleus. Note the relatively homogeneous distribution of mitochondria in all three species. Magnification is approximately 18 150x. Scale bar, 1 µm.

 


View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Representative electron micrographs from the jejunum of a harbor seal (A), dog (B) and rat (C). M, mitochondria; N, nucleus. Magnification is approximately 18 150x. Scale bar, 1 µm.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Mean mitochondrial volume density [VV(mt)] for heart, liver, kidney, stomach and intestine of the harbor seal, dog and rat. Values are means ± S.E.M. All quantities expressed per tissue volume. {alpha}Significantly different from dog (ANOVA, P<0.05); {delta}significantly different from rat (ANOVA, P<0.05); {omega}significantly different from seal (ANOVA, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Mitochondrial volume densities [VV(mt)] scaled to tissue-specific resting metabolic rate (RMR) for rats, dogs and harbor seals. {alpha}Significantly different from dog (ANOVA, P<0.05); {delta}significantly different from rat (ANOVA, P<0.05); {omega}significantly different from seal (ANOVA, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Citrate synthase (CS) activity scaled to tissue-specific resting metabolic rate (RMR) for rats, dogs and harbor seals. {alpha}Significantly different from dog (ANOVA, P<0.05); {delta}significantly different from rat (ANOVA, P<0.05); {omega}significantly different from seal (ANOVA, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. ß-Hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (HOAD) activity scaled to tissue-specific resting metabolic rate (RMR) for rats, dogs and harbor seals. {alpha}Significantly different from dog (ANOVA, P<0.05); {delta}significantly different from rat (ANOVA, P<0.05); {omega}significantly different from seal (ANOVA, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity scaled to tissue-specific metabolic rate (RMR) for rats, dogs and harbor seals. {alpha}Significantly different from dog (ANOVA, P<0.05); {delta}significantly different from rat (ANOVA, P<0.05); {omega}significantly different from seal (ANOVA, P<0.05).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003