First published online October 10, 2003
Exposure to ultraviolet radiation causes apoptosis in developing sea urchin embryos
Michael P. Lesser*,
Valerie A. Kruse and
Thomas M. Barry
Department of Zoology and Center for Marine Biology, University of
New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. DNA damage measured as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (means ±
S.D.) of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis)
embryos exposed to UVR in the five treatment groups. Treatment groups that
share superscripts within each developmental stage of the experiment are not
significantly different from one another using multiple comparison testing
(SNK) at a significance level of 0.05%.
|
|

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. (A) Superoxide dismutase protein (SOD) concentration measured as optical
density (relative units) of immunoblots of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus
droebachiensis) embryos exposed to UVR in the five treatment groups. (B)
p53 protein concentration measured as optical density of immunoblots
of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) embryos exposed to
UVR at five different wavelengths (treatment groups). (C) p21 protein
concentration measured as optical density of immunoblots of sea urchin
(Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) embryos exposed to UVR in the
five treatment groups. (D) cdc2 protein concentration measured as
optical density of immunoblots of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus
droebachiensis) freshly fertilized embryos exposed to UVR in the five
treatment groups. See representative immunoblot above each bar graph.
N=3 samples for each treatment (i.e. filter); values are means
± S.D. of relative optical density. Treatment groups that
share superscripts are not significantly different from one another using
multiple comparison testing (SNK) at a significance level of 0.05%. FFE,
freshly fertilized embryos.
|
|

View larger version (146K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Freshly fertilized embryos of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus
droebachiensis after exposure to UVR at five different wavelengths
(treatment groups). DNA damage was assessed by TUNEL-positive fluorescence,
which reveals cells with DNA strand damage. See text for details. (A) 280 nm,
(B) 305 nm, (C) 320 nm, (D) 375 nm, (E) 400 nm. Magnification 100x. (F)
Single nuclei after 280 nm treatment; magnification 5500x.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003