spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 10, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lesser, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Barry, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lesser, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Barry, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Exposure to ultraviolet radiation causes apoptosis in developing sea urchin embryos

Michael P. Lesser*, Valerie A. Kruse and Thomas M. Barry

Department of Zoology and Center for Marine Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. DNA damage measured as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (means ± S.D.) of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) embryos exposed to UVR in the five treatment groups. Treatment groups that share superscripts within each developmental stage of the experiment are not significantly different from one another using multiple comparison testing (SNK) at a significance level of 0.05%.

 


View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) Superoxide dismutase protein (SOD) concentration measured as optical density (relative units) of immunoblots of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) embryos exposed to UVR in the five treatment groups. (B) p53 protein concentration measured as optical density of immunoblots of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) embryos exposed to UVR at five different wavelengths (treatment groups). (C) p21 protein concentration measured as optical density of immunoblots of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) embryos exposed to UVR in the five treatment groups. (D) cdc2 protein concentration measured as optical density of immunoblots of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) freshly fertilized embryos exposed to UVR in the five treatment groups. See representative immunoblot above each bar graph. N=3 samples for each treatment (i.e. filter); values are means ± S.D. of relative optical density. Treatment groups that share superscripts are not significantly different from one another using multiple comparison testing (SNK) at a significance level of 0.05%. FFE, freshly fertilized embryos.

 


View larger version (146K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Freshly fertilized embryos of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis after exposure to UVR at five different wavelengths (treatment groups). DNA damage was assessed by TUNEL-positive fluorescence, which reveals cells with DNA strand damage. See text for details. (A) 280 nm, (B) 305 nm, (C) 320 nm, (D) 375 nm, (E) 400 nm. Magnification 100x. (F) Single nuclei after 280 nm treatment; magnification 5500x.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003