spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 10, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by del Campo, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miles, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by del Campo, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miles, C. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Chemosensory tuning to a host recognition cue in the facultative specialist larvae of the moth Manduca sexta

Marta L. del Campo* and Carol I. Miles

Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Typical taste receptor responses to chemostimulation of the lateral sensillum at initial contact. Traces are for a 200 ms period, and for each diet all traces are from the same larva.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Typical taste receptor responses to chemostimulation of the medial sensillum at initial contact. Traces are for a 200 ms period, and for each diet all traces are from the same larva.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Phasic portion (first 200 ms after contact) of the chemosensory responses of sensilla styloconica. (A) Lateral sensilla responses of solanaceous-reared larvae (N=16) and wheat germ diet-reared larvae (N=16). (B) Medial sensilla responses of solanaceous-reared larvae (N=10) and wheat germ diet-reared larvae (N=10). Values are means ± S.E.M. *P<0.05. For details, see text.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Typical taste receptor responses to chemostimulation of the lateral sensillum at 1 s after initial contact. Traces are for a 500 ms period, and for each diet all traces are from the same larva. S, M1, M2 and L indicate the different types of cells we identified based on the characteristics described in Materials and methods.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Tonic portion (1-30 s after contact) of chemosensory responses of the lateral sensilla styloconica. (A) Responses of wheat germ diet-reared larvae (N=16). (B) Responses of solanaceous-reared larvae (N=16). Values are means ± S.E.M.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Typical taste receptor responses to chemostimulation of the medial sensillum at 1 s after initial contact. Traces are for a 500 ms period, and for each diet all traces are from the same larva. The letters S, M1 and M2 indicate the different types of cells we identified based on the characteristics described in the methods. None of the recordings in this data set included an example of an L cell.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Tonic portion (1-30 s after contact) of the responses of chemosensory responses of the medial sensilla styloconica. (A) Responses of wheat germ diet-reared larvae (N=11). (B) Responses of solanaceous-reared larvae (N=11). Values are means ± S.E.M.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Responses of individual cells in the lateral sensilla styloconica at 1 s after contact. (A) S cell, (B) M1 cell, (C) M2 cell and (D) L cell. Values are means ± S.E.M. *P<0.05.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Responses of individual cells in the medial sensilla styloconica at 1 s after contact. (A) S cell, (B) M1 cell, (C) M2 cell and (D) L cell. Values are means ± S.E.M. *P<0.05.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003