spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 8, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ballantyne, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ballantyne, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Urea transport in kidney brush-border membrane vesicles from an elasmobranch, Raja erinacea

Robyn L. Morgan, Patricia A. Wright* and James S. Ballantyne

Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Rates of urea uptake at various urea concentrations in dorsal BBMV from the kidney of the little skate Raja erinacea. The regression is y=0.3309x, r2=0.9708. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=5. (B) Expansion of the lower end of the urea concentration range, subtracting the linear rate from A. The regression is y=0.563x, r2=0.8413. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=6.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A) Rates of urea uptake at various urea concentrations in ventral BBMV from the kidney of the little skate Raja erinacea. The regression is y=0.3312x, r2=0.9724. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=5. (B) Expansion of the lower end of the urea concentration range, subtracting the linear rate from A. The regression is y=1.3941x/(0.9016+x), r2=0.9561. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=6. (C) Lineweaver–Burk transformation of the relationship between urea concentration and urea uptake V (µmol h–1 mg–1 protein) by BBMV. The regression is y=0.5988x+0.8308, r2=0.9330. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=6.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Inhibition of urea uptake by phloretin (0.50 mmol l–1), mercury chloride (HgCl2; 0.30 mmol l–1) and phloretin (0.50 mmol l–1) + HgCl2 (0.30 mmol l–1) in dorsal and ventral BBMV from the kidney of the little skate Raja erinacea. Urea concentration in the incubation medium was 0.5 mmol l–1. Control urea uptake rates are 1.42±0.14 and 1.41±0.18 µmol h–1 mg–1 protein, for dorsal and ventral sections, respectively. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=5–7. *Significant difference from respective control; {dagger}significant difference from dorsal phloretin (ANOVA on log-transformed data, Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect on urea uptake in the dorsal and ventral BBMV from the kidney of the little skate Raja erinacea, by the urea analogs acetamide, N-methylurea (370 mmol l–1) and nitrophenylthiourea (NPTU; 0.08 mmol l–1). Urea concentration in the incubation medium was 0.5 mmol l–1. Control rates are 1.32±0.19 and 0.97±0.09 µmol h–1 mg–1 protein, for dorsal and ventral sections, respectively. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=5. *Significant difference from dorsal control (ANOVA on log-transformed data, Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test, P<0.05); {dagger}significant difference from dorsal acetamide (Student t-test on log-transformed data, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The effect of Na+ and K+ on the rate of urea transport in the dorsal and ventral BBMV from the kidney of the little skate Raja erinacea, presented as percentage of control (no ion gradient). Urea concentration in the incubation medium was 4 mmol l–1. Control rates are 1.53±0.32 and 1.56±0.29 µmol h–1 mg–1 protein, for the dorsal section Na+ and K+, respectively, and 1.77±0.44 and 1.42±0.35 µmol h–1 mg–1 protein, for the ventral section Na+ and K+ respectively. Values are means ± S.E.M., N=4. *Significant difference from ventral sodium control (Student t-test, P<0.05).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003