spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alfaro, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alfaro, M. E.

Sweeping and striking: a kinematic study of the trunk during prey capture in three thamnophiine snakes

Michael E. Alfaro

Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1025 E. 57th Street, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA and Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60805, USA



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationship of the tribe Thamnophiini (family Colubridae). Shown is the majority rules consensus of 90 000 post-burnin states visited by a million generation Bayesian Markov Monte Carlo reanalysis of previously published data (Alfaro and Arnold, 2001Go) performed using MrBayes (http://morphbank.ebc.uu.se/mrbayes/info.php). Taxa sampled in this study, indicated by arrows, represent two of the three major thamnophiine groups. Numbers above branches are the Bayesian posterior probabilities for the clade.

 


View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Digitizing protocol for kinematic analysis. From dorsal footage of feeding strikes (A), points along the trunk midline were digitized at 1-2 cm intervals. For each frame, a quintic spline was fit to these trunk points. From the spline fitting, 11 points spaced equally along the trunk were calculated (B) and retained for analysis in

 


View larger version (138K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Thamnophis couchii strike in dorsal view. t = time in seconds. At t=0, the typical prey-strike posture with a linear arrangement of body loops is evident. The strike proceeds as the anterior-most loops straighten, followed by straightening of the two larger posterior loops. T. couchii strikes were rapid and usually involved a large proportion of the trunk.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Head velocity (A), segment angle (B), path angle (C) and forward displacement (D) profiles for Thamnophis couchii. Graphs have been standardized to the time of peak velocity so that maximum velocity is reached at t=0. Error bars represent 1 S.E.M. Anterior body points are yellow, posterior points are blue. T. couchii strikes showed the highest velocities of the three species measured. Segment straightening was apparent for most positions along the trunk. Segment angles generally did not exceed 90°, indicating that the anterior ends of all segments along the trunk were pointed in the direction of the strike. Head acceleration was accompanied by substantial angular rotation in segments 1-4. Path angles for most anterior segments were under 90° and decreased with increasing velocity, indicating that these segments traveled close to the calculated strike vector. Path angles exceeded 90° for posterior segments shortly before maximum velocity was achieved. This may have been the result of backwards displacement of posterior body segments in reaction to head-accelerating forces generated by the anterior trunk. Rearwards displacement of the posterior segments was sometimes observed in video sequences. Forward displacement was substantial and decreased in an anterior to posterior direction.

 


View larger version (177K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Head sweeping by Thamnophis elegans. t = time in seconds. As the snake travels forward, the head is swung from side to side primarily by movements of the anterior trunk. Sweeping was the slowest of the behaviors observed in this study.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Diagrammatic view of point position along the trunk over the course of a sweep in Thamnophis elegans. t = time in seconds. The point of maximum head velocity is set as t=0. Colors distinguish various times. Head sweeping involves large lateral excursions of the anterior trunk while the posterior trunk remains relatively static.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Thamnophis elegans strike. Shown is a sequence from a predatory strike in dorsal view. t = time in seconds. At t=0, a strike is elicited from a motionless individual in an ambush position. Note the presence of small amplitude loops in the neck. Most of the long axis of the body is directed away from the direction of the strike. In the first 100 ms, head acceleration is accomplished by straightening of small loops in the anterior trunk as well as by the initial uncoiling of a large loop in the posterior trunk. As the strike proceeds, the large posterior coils continue to straighten, driving the largely straight anterior trunk towards the prey.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Head velocity (A), segment angle (B), path angle (C) and forward displacement (D) profiles for Thamnophis elegans. Graphs have been standardized to time of peak velocity so that maximum velocity is reached at t=0. Error bars represent 1 S.E.M. Anterior body points are yellow, posterior points are blue. Head velocity during strikes was higher than in sweeps but still lower than in the other species examined. Segment straightening was apparent for positions 2 and 3 as the head approached peak velocity. Head segment angle was variable during the initial stages of head acceleration, decreasing shortly before the head reached peak velocity. Segment 1 segment angle decreased rapidly after peak velocity. More-posterior segment angles decreased slightly after peak velocity. Path angles for the three anterior-most positions dropped sharply as the head accelerated, while positions 4-8 showed little change from an initial path of 90°. Forward displacement was greatest at the snout and positions 1 and 2.

 


View larger version (106K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Dorsal view of a predatory strike by Nerodia rhombifer. t = time in seconds. Prior to strike initiation, the snake is at rest on the bottom of the tank with the head out of the water in a typical ambush position (t=0). At t=0.017, the mouth is opened and the head is swung laterally towards the prey. As the strike proceeds, more-posterior portions of the trunk become involved in sweeping the head and prey laterally, although over two-thirds of the total length remains kinematically inactive.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Head velocity (A), segment angle (B), path angle (C) and forward displacement (D) profiles for Nerodia rhombifer. Graphs have been standardized to time of peak velocity so that maximum velocity is reached at t=0. Error bars represent 1 S.E.M. Anterior body points are yellow, posterior points are blue. The snake achieves peak velocity in approximately 50-60 ms. Starting head segment angle is approximately 90°, indicating that the head is not closely aligned to the direction of the strike at the onset of this behavior. The head and segment 1 show a sharp decrease in segment angle as the head is accelerated. Segment angle in these segments continues to decrease after peak velocity. More-posterior segments undergo relatively little angular change. Head and segment 1 path angle also markedly decrease with head velocity, while more-posterior segment angles are largely unchanged. Forward displacement is greatest at the snout, followed by body position 1. More-posterior positions experience minor displacement, with positions 5-10 undergoing periods of rearwards movement.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Summary of mean species differences in three kinematic variables. (A) Starting segment was high in N. rhombifer and T. elegans, suggesting that these species struck at prey from a greater range of positions than did T. couchii. (B) Minimum segment angle over the course of a strike was lowest for all species at the head (H). T. couchii had significantly lower segment angles than did the other two species. (C) Minimum path angle was also lowest at the head for all three species and was significantly lower in T. couchii than in either of the other two species.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003