spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Steudel, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Steudel, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The relationship between maximum jumping performance and hind limb morphology/physiology in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus)

Michelle A. Harris1,* and Karen Steudel2

1 Biology Core Curriculum, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 307 Noland Hall, 250 N. Mills Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2 Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Birge Hall, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Summary of studies of the relationship between limb length and various locomotor performance categories in terrestrial vertebrates. The year of each study is shown in parentheses. Studies shown in bold represent reports of significant relationships between limb length and designated locomotor performance; those shown in regular font did not find significant relationships. Studies designated with an asterisk used lizards as the model species. The animals used in the remaining studies (salamanders, large ungulates, frogs and cats) are indicated by silhouettes. Note that the majority of the investigations of the limb-length—jump performance relationship have used frogs as subjects, and that the current study is the only one to use an endothermic system.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Diagram of jump enclosure. Cats took off from an adjustable platform and jumped upwards to the stationary landing box.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Digital video frames showing typical stages of the takeoff period preceding cat jumps: (A) deep crouch, (B) mid-takeoff and (C) full extension of torso and hind limb at takeoff. Note the three calibration lines (joined, forming two right angles) in the background and the reflective dots designating the 11 anatomical landmarks whose movement was used to calculate maximum takeoff velocity (TOV).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Diagram of the left hind limb bones of a cat showing the three extensor muscles measured in this study: semimembranosus (hip extensor), vastus lateralis (knee extensor) and lateral gastrocnemius (ankle extensor).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Ratio of potential to kinetic energy generated during takeoff vs. residual fat mass (calculated from a regression of fat mass on lean body mass) (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient: r=0.678, P=0.002, y=0.479x+0.00011).

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Scan of SDS-PAGE gel showing myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms isolated from the cat lateral gastrocnemius muscle and from a rat skeletal muscle standard. Note that rat skeletal muscle contains a fourth isoform, Type IIb, which is not found in cat skeletal muscle. In the cat samples, the MHC Type I isoform migrates the furthest, followed by the Type IIx and Type IIa isoforms, respectively.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Maximum takeoff velocity (TOV) on day 2 vs. day 1, demonstrating the repeatability of jump performance over the two days on which it was measured for each cat (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient: r=0.841, P<0.0001, y=0.889x+41.88). There was no difference in mean TOV on day 1 vs. day 2 (paired t-test: t=-1.072, P=0.299). The reference line shown has a slope of 1.0.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. (A) Significant negative relationship between the ratio of extensor muscle mass/body mass and body fat mass (r=-0.720, P=0.001, y=-2.3x10-6x+0.019). (B) Significant positive relationship between maximum takeoff velocity (TOV) and the ratio of extensor muscle mass/body mass (r=0.647, P=0.004, y=7571x+220.9).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002