The eyes of suckermouth armoured catfish (Loricariidae, subfamily Hypostomus): pupil response, lenticular longitudinal spherical aberration and retinal topography
Ron H. Douglas1,*,
Shaun P. Collin2,3 and
Julie Corrigan1
1 Applied Vision Research Centre, Department of Optometry & Visual
Science, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
2 Department of Anatomy & Developmental Science, School of Biomedical
Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Queensland,
Australia
3 Anatomisches Institut, Universität Tübingen,
Österbergstrasse 3, Tübingen, 72074, Germany

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Pupil response of a Liposarcus pardalis individual during 60 min
exposure to different intensities of white light.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Minimum pupil area in response to different intensities of white light.
Corneal irradiance is measured in µW cm-2. The different symbols
represent data from three individual Liposarcus pardalis.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Pupil response of a Liposarcus pardalis individual to 60 min
exposure to white light at an intensity of 5.6x103 µW
cm-2. The three curves represent normalized lines for area of
irideal operculum (squares), pupil area (crosses) and horizontal pupil
diameter at its widest point (triangles).
|
|

View larger version (101K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Infra-red video images of the eye of Liposarcus pardalis (standard
length 14 cm) in (A) the absence of any visible light and (B) after 60 min
exposure to 5.6x103 µW cm-2 white light.
Illumination resulted both in a decrease of pupil diameter and the outgrowth
of an iris flap, such that overall pupil area following illumination in this
example is 34% of the dark-adapted value. Scale bar, 2 mm.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Back vertex distance (BVD) as a function of entry position of an
HeNe laser beam into the (A) right (1.65 mmx1.88 mm diameter) and
(B) left (1.63 mmx1.85 mm diameter) lens of a Pterygoplichthys
etentaculus individual. The triangles represent individual data points,
and the solid lines represent fitted non-linear regression lines [(A)
x=2.50-0.92y2+0.80y4; (B)
x=2.44-0.68y2+0.55y4]. The
beam-entry positions have been normalised so that the edges of the lens
represent 1 and -1.
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Transverse section of a Liposarcus pardalis retina. The arrow
indicates the position of the external limiting membrane. The only
photoreceptors seen throughout the retina are large rods and small single
cones. Abbreviations: RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; ROS, rod outer segment;
RIS, rod inner segment; COS, cone outer segment; CIS, cone inner segment.
Scale bar, 50 µm.
|
|

View larger version (155K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Optic axon fasciculation. Ganglion cell axon fascicles labelled with
fluorescein-tagged dextran (A) entering the dorsal region of the optic nerve
head and (B) along the embryonic fissure in the retina of Liposarcus
multiradiatus. (C) Low- and (D) high-power micrographs of retrogradely
labelled ganglion cells lying in between axon fascicles. The embryonic fissure
lies to the left in (C). Scale bars, 100 µm.
|
|

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Retinal ganglion cell labelling. (A,B) Retrogradely labelled retinal
ganglion cells in the relatively high-density regions of the retina in
Liposarcus multiradiatus. Note the heterogeneous cell soma size.
Scale bars, 50 µm.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. Iso-density contour map of the distribution of retrogradely labelled
retinal ganglion cells in the right eye of Liposarcus pardalis
(standard length 158 mm). The elongated optic nerve head is depicted in black.
All densities are x102 cells mm-2. T, temporal; V,
ventral.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002