Feeding patterns of Chelus fimbriatus (Pleurodira: Chelidae)
Patrick Lemell1,*,
Christoph Lemell2,
Peter Snelderwaard3,
Michaela Gumpenberger4,
Robert Wochesländer1 and
Josef Weisgram1
1 Department of Comparative Anatomy and Morphology, Institute of Zoology,
University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
2 Institute for Theoretical Physics, TU-Vienna, Wiedner Hauptstraße
8-10, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
3 Department of Evolutionary Morphology, Institute of Evolutionary and
Ecological Sciences, University Leiden, Kaiserstraat 63, NL-2311GP Leiden, The
Netherlands
4 Clinic of Radiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna,
Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Vienna, Austria

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of a high-speed video frame of Chelus
fimbriatus during prey capture. Dots mark the points digitized from
recordings (for details see Materials and methods); grey dots mark lead
markers for X-ray film. cbI, cornu branchiale I; cbII, cornu branchiale
II.
|
|

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Computer tomographic photographs of the skull of Chelus
fimbriatus. (A) Lateral view; (B) ventral view. The arrow in B indicates
the lower jaw, which is too thin to be reconstructed correctly. Note the
enlarged ventral area of the hyoid apparatus (hyapp); cbI, cornu branchiale I;
cbII, cornu branchiale II.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. (A) Dorsal view of skull of Chelus fimbriatus. The arrows indicate
the directions of forces produced during contraction of the jaw adductor
muscles, the shaded areas indicate the extent of the muscles and the thickness
of the arrows reflects the relative forces of the muscles; the resulting
forces produced by the muscles shown on each side are indicated next to the
skull. amextmed, pars medialis of external adductor;
amextprof, pars profunda of external adductor; amextsup,
pars superficialis of external adductor; ampost, posterior adductor; pt,
pterygoid muscle (internal adductor). (B) Lateral view of the skull. The
courses of the major visceral muscles connected to the hyoid are shown by
arrows. The resulting forces produced during contraction of the muscles are
shown at the bottom. bm, branchiomandibular muscle; chy, coracohyoid muscle;
ghyI and ghyII, geniohyoid muscles I and II.
|
|

View larger version (139K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Six single frames of a high-speed video recording (500 frames
s-1) showing a Chelus fimbriatus capturing a fish. Each
frame shows a side view (upper) and a ventral view (lower) recorded
via a 45° mirror below the tank. The real time (s:ms) is
specified above the NAC-generated time code. Grid size is 1 cmx1 cm.
|
|

View larger version (120K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Ten single frames of a high-speed X-ray film sequence (150 frames
s-1) showing a lateral view of Chelus fimbriatus capturing
a fish. The real time (s:ms) is specified in the top right corner of each
frame. The prey item appears dark because of the X-ray contrast medium; the
positions of lead markers on the turtle's skull can be seen clearly.
|
|

View larger version (133K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Eight single frames of a high-speed X-ray film sequence (150 frames
s-1) showing a lateral view of Chelus fimbriatus during
intraoral transport before swallowing. The real time (s:ms) is specified in
the top right corner of each frame. The prey item appears dark because of the
X-ray contrast medium; the positions of lead markers on the turtle's skull can
be seen clearly.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. (A) Distances covered between each frame ( s) for predator
and prey. (B) Ram-suction index (RSI) calculated for each frame of one
representative feeding sequence of Chelus fimbriatus.
Dpred and Dprey are the net distance moved
by the predator and the prey, respectively.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002