spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bury, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, F. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bury, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, F. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intestinal iron uptake in the European flounder (Platichthys flesus)

N. R. Bury1,*, M. Grosell2, C. M. Wood2, C. Hogstrand1, R. W. Wilson3, J. C. Rankin4, M. Busk4, T. Lecklin4 and F. B. Jensen4

1 Division of Health and Life Sciences, King’s College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NN, UK,
2 Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1,
3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, Devon EX4 4PS, UK and
4 Institute of Biology, SDU, Odense University, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. In vivo ferric (Fe3+) and ferrous (Fe2+) iron uptake (filled columns) from the posterior region of the intestine of the European flounder and the influence of the iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO; open columns) on this uptake rate. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=5–6). An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the control iron (Fe3+ or Fe2+) uptake rate and the uptake rate in the presence of DFO, and a double dagger indicates a significant difference in uptake rate between the forms of iron, Fe3+ or Fe2+ (Student’s t-test, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. In vivo ferrous (Fe2+) iron uptake rate in the different regions of the intestine of the European flounder. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=5–6). An asterisk indicates a significance difference between the iron uptake rates from the three regions (ANOVA followed by an LSD test, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Temporal pattern of in vitro ferrous iron (Fe2+; filled symbols) and ferric iron (Fe3+; open symbols) absorption at a concentration of 0.2 µmol l–1 iron in the three regions of the intestine of the European flounder; anterior ({blacksquare}, {square}), mid ({circ}, ) and posterior ({blacktriangledown}, {triangledown}). Values are means ± S.E.M. (N=3–4). An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the absorption of Fe3+ and Fe2+ at a particular time (Student’s t-test, P<0.05), and values with differing letters indicate significant differences between Fe2+ absorption of the three regions at the 400 min incubation point (ANOVA followed by an LSD test, P<0.05). There are no significant difference between Fe2+ absorption of the three regions at the other time points.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Concentration-dependent in vitro ferrous (Fe2+; filled symbols) and ferric (Fe3+; open symbols) iron absorption in the three regions of the intestine of the European flounder, anterior ({blacksquare}, {square}), mid ({circ}, ) and posterior ({blacktriangledown}, {triangledown}). Values are means ± S.E.M. (N=3–6). At each concentration and in each region of the intestine, the rate of iron absorption in the presence of Fe2+ is significantly greater than that in the presence of Fe3+ (Student’s t-test, P<0.05).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. In vitro ferrous iron (1 µmol l–1 Fe2+) absorption in the posterior region of the intestine of the European flounder at 1°C (filled columns) and 13°C (open columns). Values are means + S.E.M. (N=5–6).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. In vitro rates of ferrous iron (Fe2+) absorption at 1 µmol l–1 in the three regions of the intestine of the European flounder, (A,D) anterior, (B,E) mid and (C,F) posterior, of control (filled circles and open columns) and anaemic (open circles and filled columns) fish. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=4–5). An asterisk indicates a significant difference in the rates of iron absorption (Student’s t-test, P<0.05). Linear regression analysis for iron absorption versus haematocrit shows r=–0.57, P=0.085 for the anterior region, r=0.10, P=0.63 for the mid region and r=–0.86, P=0.003 for the posterior region.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. In vitro rate of ferrous iron (1 µmol l–1 Fe2+) absorption in the posterior region of the intestine of the European flounder at different pH values. The pH of the intestinal lumen changed over the experimental period; see text for details. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=5–6). There were no significant differences between rates of iron absorption.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001