spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KUMAR, V.
Right arrow Articles by MALIK, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KUMAR, V.
Right arrow Articles by MALIK, S.

EFFECTS OF DURATION AND TIME OF FOOD AVAILABILITY ON PHOTOPERIODIC RESPONSES IN THE MIGRATORY MALE BLACKHEADED BUNTING (EMBERIZA MELANOCEPHALA)

VINOD KUMAR*, SUDHI SINGH, MANJU MISRA and SHALIE MALIK

Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow - 226 007, India
* e-mail: drvkumar{at}sancharnet.in



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Results from experiment 1. (A) Food intake, (B) body mass on day 21 (shown as per cent change relative to values on day 0), and (C) change in testicular volume on day 21 relative to that on day 0. At the beginning of the experiment, testes of birds in all groups were minimum in size (approximately 0.33 mm3). Photosensitive birds (N=5-6 per group) were exposed to a 16 h:8 h L:D photoperiod for 3 weeks and received food ad libitum or for 8 h or 4 h only. Values are means ± S.E.M. except in A where food intake bird-1 day-1 refers to value calculated from a group value, obtained from of a group of birds (N=5-6) housed within one cage (see Materials and methods). * indicates a significant difference (P<0.05) from day 0 values (paired t-test); {ddagger} indicates a significant difference compared to the ad libitum group at day 21.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Results from experiment 2. (A,B) Food intake, (C,D) body mass (shown as per cent change relative to values on day 0), and (E, F) change in testis volume after 21 days relative to that on day 0. At the beginning of the experiment, testes of birds in all groups were minimum in size (approximately 0.33 mm3). Of five groups of photosensitive birds (N=6 in each), group I was exposed to an 8 h:16 h L:D photoperiod and fed ad libitum, and groups II-V were subjected to 16 h:8 h L:D photoperiod and given an ad libitum or restricted (5 h) food supply: group II, ad libitum; group III, zt 0-5; group IV, zt 5.5-10.5; group V, zt 11-16; zt=0 indicates the beginning of the lights-on period. The experiment ran for a period of 3 weeks. Values are means ± S.E.M. except in A and B, where food intake bird-1 day-1 refers to values calculated from a group value, obtained from a group of birds (N=5-6) housed within one cage (see Materials and methods). * indicates a significant difference (P<0.05) relative to the value on day 0 (one-way repeated-measures ANOVA or paired t-test; ** indicates a significant difference within a group as a function of the duration of the experiment (one-way repeated-measures ANOVA); {ddagger} indicates a significant difference between groups on the indicated days; + indicates a significant difference with respect to the long-day controls.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001