Avian ultraviolet vision and frequency-dependent seed preferences
Stuart C. Church*,
Annabel S. L. Merrison and
Toby M. M. Chamberlain
Ecology of Vision Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. (A) Mean transmission spectra of ultraviolet-transmitting (UV+) and ultraviolet-blocking (UV-) filters used in experiment 1. (B) Mean transmission spectra of ultraviolet-blocking (UV-), short-wavelength blocking (SW-), medium-wavelength blocking (MW-) and long-wavelength blocking (LW-) filters used in experiment 2. (C) Reflectance spectra of red millet seeds, white millet seeds and their sand background used in experiments 1 and 2. Values are means ± S.E.M. (N=8 for all three means).
|
|

View larger version (7K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Experiment 1: the effect of frequency and filter type (UV+ or UV-; see Fig.1) on seed selectivity (ßred) by zebra finches. Open columns represent a 1:9 ratio (20:180) and filled columns a 9:1 ratio (180:20) of red:white millet seeds. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=8).
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Experiment 2: the effect of seed frequency and filter type (ultraviolet-blocking (UV-), short-wavelength blocking (SW-), medium-wavelength blocking (MW-) or long-wavelength blocking (LW-) on selectivity (ßred) by zebra finches. As in Fig.2, open columns represent a 1:9 ratio (20:180) and filled columns a 9:1 ratio (180:20) of red:white millet seeds. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=8).
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001