spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Church, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, T. M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Church, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, T. M. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Avian ultraviolet vision and frequency-dependent seed preferences

Stuart C. Church*, Annabel S. L. Merrison and Toby M. M. Chamberlain

Ecology of Vision Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. (A) Mean transmission spectra of ultraviolet-transmitting (UV+) and ultraviolet-blocking (UV-) filters used in experiment 1. (B) Mean transmission spectra of ultraviolet-blocking (UV-), short-wavelength blocking (SW-), medium-wavelength blocking (MW-) and long-wavelength blocking (LW-) filters used in experiment 2. (C) Reflectance spectra of red millet seeds, white millet seeds and their sand background used in experiments 1 and 2. Values are means ± S.E.M. (N=8 for all three means).

 


View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Experiment 1: the effect of frequency and filter type (UV+ or UV-; see Fig.1) on seed selectivity (ßred) by zebra finches. Open columns represent a 1:9 ratio (20:180) and filled columns a 9:1 ratio (180:20) of red:white millet seeds. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=8).

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Experiment 2: the effect of seed frequency and filter type (ultraviolet-blocking (UV-), short-wavelength blocking (SW-), medium-wavelength blocking (MW-) or long-wavelength blocking (LW-) on selectivity (ßred) by zebra finches. As in Fig.2, open columns represent a 1:9 ratio (20:180) and filled columns a 9:1 ratio (180:20) of red:white millet seeds. Values are means + S.E.M. (N=8).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001