QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by EDWARDS, D. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by EDWARDS, D. H., JR

Journal of Experimental Biology 99,61-90 (1982)
Published by Company of Biologists 1982

The Cockroach DCMD Neurone : I. Lateral Inhibition and the Effects of Light- and Dark-adaptation

DONALD H. EDWARDS JR ¹

¹ Department of Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. 06520; Department of Biology, Georgia State University Atlanta, GA 30303

1. The responses of the cockroach descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) neurone to moving light stimuli were studied under both light- and dark-adapted conditions.

2. With light-adaptation the response of the DCMD to two moving 2° (diam.) spots of white light is less than the response to a single spot when the two spots are separated by less than 10° (Fig. 2). 3. With light-adaptation the response of the DCMD to a single moving light spot is a sigmoidally shaped function of the logarithm of the light intensity (Fig. 3a). With dark-adaptation the response of a DCMD to a single moving light spot is a bell-shaped function of the logarithm of the stimulus intensity (Fig. 3b). The absolute intensity that evokes a threshold response is about one-and-a-half log units less in the dark-adapted eye than in the light-adapted eye.

4. The decrease in the DCMD's response that occurs when two stimuli are closer than 10°, and when a single bright stimulus is made brighter, indicates that lateral inhibition operates among the afferents to the DCMD.

5. It is shown that this inhibition cannot be produced by a recurrent lateral inhibitory network. A model of the afferent path that contains a non-recurrent lateral inhibitory network can account for the response/intensity plots of the DCMD recorded under both light-adapted and dark-adapted conditions.

6. The threshold intensity of the DCMD is increased if a stationary pattern of light is present near the path of the moving spot stimulus. This is shown to be due to a peripheral tonic lateral inhibition that is distinct from the non-recurrent lateral inhibition described earlier.

7. It is suggested that the peripheral lateral inhibition acts to adjust the threshold of afferents to local background light levels, while the proximal non-recurrent network acts to enhance the acuity of the eye to small objects in the visual field, and to filter out whole-field stimuli.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Peron, H. G. Krapp, and F. Gabbiani Influence of Electrotonic Structure and Synaptic Mapping on the Receptive Field Properties of a Collision-Detecting Neuron J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 159 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Krapp and F. Gabbiani Spatial Distribution of Inputs and Local Receptive Field Properties of a Wide-Field, Looming Sensitive Neuron J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2240 - 2253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bult and H.A.K. Mastebroek Circadian Control of Visual Information Processing in the Optic Lobe of the Giant Cockroach Blaberus giganteus J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1993; 8(4): 311 - 323. [Abstract] [PDF]