spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DERBY, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by ATEMA, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DERBY, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by ATEMA, J.
Journal of Experimental Biology 98,303-315 (1982)
Published by Company of Biologists 1982


Chemosensitivity of Walking Legs of the Lobster Homarus Americanus: Neurophysiological Response Spectrum and Thresholds

CHARLES D. DERBY 1 and JELLE ATEMA 2

1 Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, U.S.A; Whitney Marine Laboratory, University of Florida; Rt. 1, Box 121, St Augustine Florida 32084
2 Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, U.S.A

Responses of chemoreceptors in the walking legs of the lobster Homarus americanus to 35 individual compounds and 3 mixtures (prey odours and extracts) were studied using extracellular recording techniques. Compared against a standard mussel (Mytilus edulis) extract, these receptors were most sensitive to the amino acids L-glutamate, hydroxy-L-proline, L-aspartate, L-arginine, glycine, taurine, and L-alanine, as well as such other compounds as ammonium chloride, betaine, and the tripeptide glutathione. Most of these excitants are among those compounds most prevalent in the prey of lobsters. Some proteins and odours from live prey were also effective stimuli. In general, carbohydrates, alcohols, nucleosides, and nucleotides were only slightly excitatory. The lowest thresholds for 10 compounds ranged from 3.5x10-6 to 3.5x10-14 M; these thresholds are lower than previously reported for crustacean taste receptors.

Submitted on August 12, 1981




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. Mellon Jr
Combining Dissimilar Senses: Central Processing of Hydrodynamic and Chemosensory Inputs in Aquatic Crustaceans
Biol. Bull., August 1, 2007; 213(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Steullet, O. Dudar, T. Flavus, M. Zhou, and C. D. Derby
Selective ablation of antennular sensilla on the Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus suggests that dual antennular chemosensory pathways mediate odorant activation of searching and localization of food
J. Exp. Biol., March 14, 2002; 204(24): 4259 - 4269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1982