QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by COOMBS, S. Articles by POPPER, A. N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by COOMBS, S. Articles by POPPER, A. N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology 97,225-239 (1982)
Published by Company of Biologists 1982

Structure and Function of the Auditory System in the Clown Knifefish, Notopterus Chitala

SHERYL COOMBS ¹ and ARTHUR N. POPPER ²

¹ Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii, 2538 The Mall, Honolulu, Hi 96822, U.S.A., Department of Anatomy, Georgetown University Schools of Medicine and Dentistry 3900 Reservoir Rd, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20007, U.S.; Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University of Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridanmi, Chicago, Illinois 60626 U.S.A.
² Department of Anatomy, Georgetown University Schools of Medicine Dentistry 3900 Reservoir Rd, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20007, U.S.A.

Hearing sensitivity and the anatomy of the auditory system in the clown knifefish, Notopterus chitala, were studied using behavioural techniques and scanning electron microscopy. While many structural features of the inner ear were similar to those found in other teleost species, the saccular endorgan in Notopterus was unusual in having three discrete epithelial regions. These regions could be distinguished from one another by regional differences in portions of the otolith overlaying them, by hair-cell orientation patterns, and by their position relative to the swimbladder. Notopterus was found to be able to detect sounds from 100 to 1000 Hz and best sensitivity occurred at 500 Hz, where the mean threshold was - 30 dB (re: 1 microbar). For frequencies from 300 to 700 Hz there was substantial variation in threshold values and indications of a bimodal distribution of thresholds. One hypothesis that may tie the ultrastructural and behavioural results together is that the ear in Notopterus is anatomically and functionally differentiated to mediate independent detection of two sound properties: changes in pressure and particle motion.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?