spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HILLERTON, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by VINCENT, J. F. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HILLERTON, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by VINCENT, J. F. V.
Journal of Experimental Biology 96,45-52 (1982)
Published by Company of Biologists 1982


On the Indentation Hardness of Insect Cuticle

J. E. HILLERTON 1, S. E. REYNOLDS 2, and J. F. V. VINCENT 1

1 Biomechanics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AJ
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY

The indentation hardness of locust cuticle was measured using a Vickers diamond applied to the surface of the cuticle. A number of areas of cuticle showed similar hardness values, approximately 24 kg mm-2, for the dehydrated cuticle but the mandibles (29.8 kg mm-2) and the dorsal mesothorax (33.3 kg mm-2) were harder. The mandibles have localized areas of hardness which are related to their function. It is suggested that the hardness of the dorsal thorax may be related to its function as an energy storing structure in flight. The measured hardness of cuticle depends on the hydration of the material but relative differences between cuticles from different parts of the locust persist whether tested fresh or after dehydration. Hardness is correlated with the dihydroxyphenol content of cuticle (unlike stiffness), conversely it is not correlated with the hydrophobicity of the matrix proteins (unlike stiffness). It is emphasized that hardness and stiffness are very different mechanical properties.

Submitted on January 21, 1981




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Muller, M. Olek, M. Giersig, and H. Schmitz
Micromechanical properties of consecutive layers in specialized insect cuticle: the gula of Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) and the infrared sensilla of Melanophila acuminata (Coleoptera, Buprestidae)
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2008; 211(16): 2576 - 2583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
N. Barbakadze, S. Enders, S. Gorb, and E. Arzt
Local mechanical properties of the head articulation cuticle in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae)
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2006; 209(4): 722 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. B. Kesel, A. Martin, and T. Seidl
Adhesion measurements on the attachment devices of the jumping spider Evarcha arcuata
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2003; 206(16): 2733 - 2738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. C. Lichtenegger, T. Schoberl, J. T. Ruokolainen, J. O. Cross, S. M. Heald, H. Birkedal, J. H. Waite, and G. D. Stucky
Zinc and mechanical prowess in the jaws of Nereis, a marine worm
PNAS, August 5, 2003; 100(16): 9144 - 9149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1982