spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LOMBARD, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by WERNER, Y. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LOMBARD, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by WERNER, Y. L.
Journal of Experimental Biology 91,57-71 (1981)
Published by Company of Biologists 1981


Underwater Hearing in the Frog, Rana Catesbeiana

R. ERIC LOMBARD 1, RICHARD R. FAY 2, and YEHUDAH L. WERNER 3

1 Department of Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1025 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637 (U.S.A.)
2 Department of Psychology, Loyola University, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, Illinois 60626 (U.S.A.)
3 Department of Zoology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Comparable auditory sound pressure level (SPL) and sound intensity level(SIL) threshold curves were determined in air and under water in Ranacatesbeiana. Threshold curves were determined using chronic metal electrodeimplants which detected multi-unit responses of the torus semicircularis toincident sound. In terms of SPL, hearing thresholds in water and air aresimilar below 0.2 kHz. Above 0.2 kHz, the sensitivity under water falls of fat about 16 dB/octave to reach an average loss of about 30 dB above 0.4 kHz. In terms of SIL, the organism is about 30 dB more sensitive under water than in air below 0.2 kHz and equally sensitive in air and water above 0.4 kHz.The relative merits of the two measures are discussed and an attempt is made to relate the results to morphology of the middle and inner ears. This report is the first to compare aerial and underwater hearing abilities in any organism using electrode implants.

Submitted on July 16, 1980




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. J. Mason and P. M. Narins
Vibrometric studies of the middle ear of the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana II. The operculum
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2002; 205(20): 3167 - 3176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1981