spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEINRICH, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HEINRICH, B.
Journal of Experimental Biology 91,25-55 (1981)
Published by Company of Biologists 1981


The Mechanisms and Energetics of Honeybee Swarm Temperature Regulation

BERND HEINRICH 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405

1. Free (active) honeybee swarms regulated their core temperature (Tc) generally within 1 °C of 35 °C. They maintained the same temperature around freshly built honeycomb, and in the brood nest of the hive, from ambient temperatures of between at least 1 and 25 °C. Captive (inactive) swarms in the laboratory often allowed Tc to decline below 35 °C.

2. The temperature of the swarm mantle (Tm) varied with the general activity of the swarm as well as with ambient temperature (TA), but in captive swarms (and sometimes at night in free swarms), Tm was generally held above 17 °C, even at TA < 5 °C.

3. Within the swarm, temperatures varied between 36 °C, an upper temperature set-point, and 17 °C, a lower temperature set-point.

4. Before swarm take-off, all temperature gradients in the swarm were abolished and Tm equalled Tc.

5. The regulated Tc and Tm were unrelated to size and passive cooling rates in swarms ranging from 1000 to 30000 bees.

6. The weight-specific metabolic rate of swarms was correlated with TA and Tc, but relatively little affected by swarm size.

7. Bees on the mantle experiencing low temperatures pushed inward, thus contracting the mantle, diminishing the mantle porosity, and filling interior passageways. As a result, their own rate of heat loss, as well as that from the swarm core, decreased.

8. In large tightly clumped swarms, even at TA < 5 °C, the resting metabolic rate of the bees in the swarm core was more than sufficient to maintain Tc at 35 °C or above. The active thermoregulatory metabolism was due to the bees on the swarm mantle.

9. There was little physical exchange of bees between core and mantle at low (< 5 °C) TA. In addition, there was no apparent chemical or acoustic communication between the bees in the swarm mantle that are subjected to the changes of the thermal environments and the bees in the swarm interior that constantly experience 35 °C regardless of TA.

10. The data are summarized in a model of Tc control indicating a primary role of the mantle bees in controlling heat production and heat loss.

11. The possible ecological significance of swarm temperature regulation is discussed.

Submitted on July 17, 1980




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Stabentheiner, H. Pressl, T. Papst, N. Hrassnigg, and K. Crailsheim
Endothermic heat production in honeybee winter clusters
J. Exp. Biol., March 2, 2003; 206(2): 353 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
C. Anderson
Self-Organization in Relation to Several Similar Concepts: Are the Boundaries to Self-Organization Indistinct?
Biol. Bull., June 1, 2002; 202(3): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1981