QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BENNET-CLARK, H. C. Articles by ALDER, G. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by BENNET-CLARK, H. C. Articles by ALDER, G. M.

Journal of Experimental Biology 82,105-121 (1979)
Published by Company of Biologists 1979

The Effect of Air Resistance on the Jumping Performance of Insects

H. C. BENNET-CLARK ¹ and G. M. ALDER ²

¹ Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS
² Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT

A spring gun was constructed to propel objects at known velocities of between 1 and 4.5 m.s^-1. This was used to project insects and various models in a vertical trajectory. By comparing the height attained in air by the insects or models with the height theoretically possible in vacuo, the energy lost against air resistance was observed. Small insects have a higher frontal area to mass ratio than larger ones so have relatively more aerodynamic drag and attain lower heights.

The observed effect may be expressed in terms of the drag coefficient, C_D. Fleas and locusts have C_D of about 1 Winged flies have C_D of about 1.5 which falls to about 1 when the wings are amputated and to about o-8 when the legs are amputated. Aptery is advantageous in jumping insects.

From experiments with models, it appears that the optimal condition for small jumping insects is that the body should be as compact as possible to reduce the frontal area to mass ratio. Thus dense spherical bodies are favoured. Some species of jumping insect have densities of about 1 mg.mm^-3 while some flying beetles and flies have densities between 0.3 and 0.8 mg.mm^-3.

The Reynolds number at which the experiments were performed was from 65-205 for fleas up to 740-2340 for locusts. The models operated in similar ranges.

At a velocity which would propel a larger animal to a height of 1 m, fleas weighing 0.4 mg only reach about 0.4 m. At lower initial velocities, proportionately less energy is wasted against air resistance so the jump efficiency is higher. Most fleas jump to a height of about 0.1 m with an efficiency of 0.8 while locusts jump to a height of 0.35 m with an efficiency of over 0.9. Air resistance is thus an important scale effect in jumping insects and provides its own design constraints.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Burrows and G. P. Sutton The effect of leg length on jumping performance of short- and long-legged leafhopper insects J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1317 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Burrows Kinematics of jumping in leafhopper insects (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae) J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3579 - 3589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Burrows Jumping performance of froghopper insects J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 209(23): 4607 - 4621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. N. Patek, J. E. Baio, B. L. Fisher, and A. V. Suarez Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: Ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants PNAS, August 22, 2006; 103(34): 12787 - 12792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Zumstein, O. Forman, U. Nongthomba, J. C. Sparrow, and C. J. H. Elliott Distance and force production during jumping in wild-type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2004; 207(20): 3515 - 3522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]