spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEIL, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by SCHÖNE, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NEIL, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by SCHÖNE, H.
Journal of Experimental Biology 79,59-67 (1979)
Published by Company of Biologists 1979


Reactions of the Spiny Lobster Palinurus Vulgaris to Substrate Tilt : II. Input-Output Anaylsis of Eyestalk Responses

DOUGLAS M. NEIL 1 and HERMANN SCHÖNE 2

1 Max-Planck Institut für Verhalternsphysiologie, D-8131 Seewiesen; Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland
2 Max-Planck Institut für Verhalternsphysiologie, D-8131 Seewiesen

1. The input-output properties of the eyestalk responses of Palmurus vulgaris to substrate tilt are described in both the time and frequency domains.

2. Trapezoidal substrate movements elicit phaso-tonic eyestalk movements which decay from the phasic peak to the tonic plateau with time constants of 9.2 s (tilt) and 6.1 s (return) (Fig. 1). Average eye excursions for tilt and return are equivalent (Fig. 2).

3. The relationship to tilt amplitude is non-linear (Fig. 3), and with stepwise tilts in opposite directions a marked hysteresis is evident (Fig. 4).

4. Sinusoidal stimuli produce consistent eyestalk responses (Fig. 5), and a frequency analysis reveals a high gain, phase-leading region below 0.25 Hz (Fig. 6). Around this frequency the eyestalk response is effectively a compensation with respect to both amplitude and phase position.

5. The results are considered in relation both to the experimental arrangement with fixed body and vision excluded, and to the normal biological situation.

Submitted on June 8, 1978







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1979