spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 62, Issue 1 11-26, Copyright © 1975 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Convergence of olfactory inputs from both antennae in the brain of the honeybee

H Suzuki

Electrical activities of the olfactory neurones in the brain of the honeybee were investigated. Odorous stimuli were given to each antenna separately or to both simultaneously. The inputs from the antennae affected both the impulse frequency and the latency of the olfactory interneurones in the protocerebrum. The predominant response was to the stimulation of the ipsilateral antenna. Input from the contralateral antenna produced mainly excitatory effects, although a few inputs gave inhibitory effects. No particular relationships between the loci of the units in the brain and the types of responses produced were found. Most of the units were located in the protocerebral lobe and in the central commissure. The units in the deutocerebrum responded only to the stimulation of the ipsilateral antenna, and the magnitude of response and the latency were not different with respect to unilateral or bilateral stimulation of the antennae. Differences in latency between unilateral and bilateral stimulation were observed in some of the units in the protocerebrum. Neural models which explain these phenomena are postulated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. G. Perk and A. R. Mercer
Dopamine Modulation of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Antennal-Lobe Neurons
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 1147 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. Brown, R. M. Napper, C. M. Thompson, and A. R. Mercer
Stereological Analysis Reveals Striking Differences in the Structural Plasticity of Two Readily Identifiable Glomeruli in the Antennal Lobes of the Adult Worker Honeybee
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2002; 22(19): 8514 - 8522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Learn. Mem.Home page
J.-C. Sandoz, M. Hammer, and R. Menzel
Side-Specificity of Olfactory Learning in the Honeybee: US Input Side
Learn. Mem., September 1, 2002; 9(5): 337 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1975