|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Quick Estimates of Flight Fitness in Hovering Animals, Including Novel Mechanisms for Lift Production
1 Department of Zoology, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
1. On the assumption that steady-state aerodynamics applies, simple analytical expressions are derived for the average lift coefficient, Reynolds number, the aerodynamic power, the moment of inertia of the wing mass and the dynamic efficiency in animals which perform normal hovering with horizontally beating wings.
2. The majority of hovering animals, including large lamellicorn beetles and sphingid moths, depend mainly on normal aerofoil action. However, in some groups with wing loading less than 10 N m-2 (1 kgf m-2), non-steady aerodynamics must play a major role, namely in very small insects at low Reynolds number, in true hover-flies (Syrphinae), in large dragonflies (Odonata) and in many butterflies (Lepidoptera Rhopalocera).
3. The specific aerodynamic power ranges between 1.3 and 4.7 WN-1 (11-40 cal h-1 gf-1) but power output does not vary systematically with size, inter alia because the lift/drag ratio deteriorates at low Reynolds number.
4. Comparisons between metabolic rate, aerodynamic power and dynamic efficiency show that the majority of insects require and depend upon an effective elastic system in the thorax which counteracts the bending moments caused by wing inertia.
5. The free flight of a very small chalcid wasp Encarsia formosa has been analysed by means of slow-motion films. At this low Reynolds number (10-20), the high lift co-efficient of 2 or 3 is not possible with steady-state aerodynamics and the wasp must depend almost entirely on non-steady flow patterns.
6. The wings of Encarsia are moved almost horizontally during hovering, the body being vertical, and there are three unusual phases in the wing stroke: the clap, the fling and the flip. In the clap the wings are brought together at the top of the morphological upstroke. In the fling, which is a pronation at the beginning of the morphological downstroke, the opposed wings are flung open like a book, hinging about their posterior margins. In the flip, which is a supination at the beginning of the morphological upstroke, the wings are rapidly twisted through about 180°.
7. The fling is a hitherto undescribed mechanism for creating lift and for setting up the appropriate circulation over the wing in anticipation of the downstroke. In the case of Encarsia the calculated and observed wing velocities at which lift equals body weight are in agreement, and lift is produced almost instantaneously from the beginning of the downstroke and without any Wagner effect. The fling mechanism seems to be involved in the normal flight of butterflies and possibly of Drosophila and other small insects. Dimensional and other considerations show that it could be a useful mechanism in birds and bats during take-off and in emergencies.
8. The flip is also believed to be a means of setting up an appropriate circulation around the wing, which has hitherto escaped attention; but its operation is less well understood. It is not confined to Encarsia but operates in other insects, not only at the beginning of the upstroke (supination) but also at the beginning of the downstroke where a flip (pronation) replaces the clap and fling of Encarsia. A study of freely flying hover-flies strongly indicates that the Syrphinae (and Odonata) depend almost entirely upon the flip mechanism when hovering. In the case of these insects a transient circulation is presumed to be set up before the translation of the wing through the air, by the rapid pronation (or supination) which affects the stiff anterior margin before the soft posterior portions of the wing. In the flip mechanism vortices of opposite sense must be shed, and a Wagner effect must be present.
9. In some hovering insects the wing twistings occur so rapidly that the speed of propagation of the elastic torsional wave from base to tip plays a significant role and appears to introduce beneficial effects.
10. Non-steady periods, particularly flip effects, are present in all flapping animals and they will modify and become superimposed upon the steady-state pattern as described by the mathematical model presented here. However, the accumulated evidence indicates that the majority of hovering animals conform reasonably well with that model.
11. Many new types of analysis are indicated in the text and are now open for future theoretical and experimental research.
Submitted on January 11, 1973
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. T. Muijres, L. C. Johansson, R. Barfield, M. Wolf, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom Leading-Edge Vortex Improves Lift in Slow-Flying Bats Science, February 29, 2008; 319(5867): 1250 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F.-O. Lehmann When wings touch wakes: understanding locomotor force control by wake wing interference in insect wings J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 224 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Aono, F. Liang, and H. Liu Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 239 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Warrick, C. J. Clark, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, G. A. Hyder, and A. A. Biewener Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2368 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann and S. Pick The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1362 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. M. L. Norberg and Y. Winter Wing beat kinematics of a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, flying at different flight speeds and Strouhal numbers J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2006; 209(19): 3887 - 3897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Bender and M. H. Dickinson Visual stimulation of saccades in magnetically tethered Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3170 - 3182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Heymann and F.-O. Lehmann The significance of spiracle conductance and spatial arrangement for flight muscle function and aerodynamic performance in flying Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1662 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Dudek and R. J. Full Passive mechanical properties of legs from running insects J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2006; 209(8): 1502 - 1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3075 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Borrell, J. A. Goldbogen, and R. Dudley Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2939 - 2949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. Fry, R. Sayaman, and M. H. Dickinson The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2303 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Alexander Models and the scaling of energy costs for locomotion J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2005; 208(9): 1645 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Bomphrey, N. J. Lawson, N. J. Harding, G. K. Taylor, and A. L. R. Thomas The aerodynamics of Manduca sexta: digital particle image velocimetry analysis of the leading-edge vortex J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2005; 208(6): 1079 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin A computational fluid dynamics of `clap and fling' in the smallest insects J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Maybury and F.-O. Lehmann The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4707 - 4726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Dickson and M. H. Dickinson The effect of advance ratio on the aerodynamics of revolving wings J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4269 - 4281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. J. Wang The role of drag in insect hovering J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2004; 207(23): 4147 - 4155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 3073 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Wu and M. Sun Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1137 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. J. Wang, J. M. Birch, and M. H. Dickinson Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 449 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. W. Bundle and K. P. Dial Mechanics of wing-assisted incline running (WAIR) J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2003; 206(24): 4553 - 4564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. H. Wu Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3065 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. G. Drucker and G. V. Lauder Function of pectoral fins in rainbow trout: behavioral repertoire and hydrodynamic forces J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2003; 206(5): 813 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Altshuler and R. Dudley The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2325 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. Tang Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2413 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Usherwood and C. P. Ellington The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1547 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Usherwood and C. P. Ellington The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1565 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Walker Functional Morphology and Virtual Models: Physical Constraints on the Design of Oscillating Wings, Fins, Legs, and Feet at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 232 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Walker and M. W. Westneat Performance limits of labriform propulsion and correlates with fin shape and motion J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2002; 205(2): 177 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. Tang Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2002; 205(1): 55 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Williamson, K. Dial, and A. Biewener Pectoralis muscle performance during ascending and slow level flight in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2001; 204(3): 495 - 507. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Wootton, K. Evans, R Herbert, and C. Smith The hind wing of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskal). I. Functional morphology and mode of operation J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(19): 2921 - 2931. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Wootton Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3333 - 3345. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Ellington The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3439 - 3448. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Drucker and G. Lauder Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 1999; 202(18): 2393 - 2412. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Alexander Springs for wings Science, April 7, 1995; 268(5207): 50 - 51. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. SOMPS and M. LUTTGES Dragonfly Flight: Novel Uses of Unsteady Separated Flows Science, June 14, 1985; 228(4705): 1326 - 1329. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. STRICKLER Calanoid Copepods, Feeding Currents, and the Role of Gravity Science, October 8, 1982; 218(4568): 158 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
