QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BERNSTEIN, M. H. Articles by SCHMIDT-NIELSEN, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by BERNSTEIN, M. H. Articles by SCHMIDT-NIELSEN, K.

Journal of Experimental Biology 58,401-410 (1973)
Published by Company of Biologists 1973

Power Input During Flight of the Fish Crow, Corvus Ossifragus

MARVIN H. BERNSTEIN ¹, STEVEN P. THOMAS ¹, and KNUT SCHMIDT-NIELSEN ¹

¹ Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706

1. The fish crow and the laughing gull, although similar in body mass, differ in wing morphology and wingbeat frequency. We studied the power input during sustained flight in the fish crow for comparison with data reported for the laughing gull.

2. Two fish crows (mean mass 275 g) were trained to fly in a wind-tunnel for 15-20 min at air speeds of 7-11 m s^-1 in descending flight at angles of 2°, 4° and 6° relative to horizontal. Oxygen consumption was determined by analysing air sampled through a mask and attached trailing air tube. Power input was defined as the rate of metabolic energy expenditure calculated from rate of oxygen consumption. The results were corrected for the drag of the mask and tube, and power input for horizontal flight was calculated.

3. Power input varied little with air speed, but decreased with increasing angle of descent. Minimum power input for horizontal flight (0.083 W g^-1) was 6.4 times greater than mean resting power input. During horizontal flight, power input for the fish crow exceeded by about one-third that for the laughing gull.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W. Bundle, K. S. Hansen, and K. P. Dial Does the metabolic rate-flight speed relationship vary among geometrically similar birds of different mass? J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2007; 210(6): 1075 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ward, U. Moller, J. M. V. Rayner, D. M. Jackson, D. Bilo, W. Nachtigall, and J. R. Speakman Metabolic power, mechanical power and efficiency during wind tunnel flight by the European starling Sturnus vulgaris J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3311 - 3322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Nudds and D. Bryant The energetic cost of short flights in birds J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 2000; 203(10): 1561 - 1572. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A Hedenstrom, M Rosen, S Akesson, and F Spina Flight performance during hunting excursions in Eleonora's falcon Falco eleonorae J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 1999; 202(15): 2029 - 2039. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Bennett and J. Ruben Endothermy and activity in vertebrates Science, November 9, 1979; 206(4419): 649 - 654. [Abstract] [PDF]